Experience with ultrasound scissors and blades (UltraCision) in open and laparoscopic liver resection
- PMID: 11753039
- PMCID: PMC1422392
- DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200201000-00004
Experience with ultrasound scissors and blades (UltraCision) in open and laparoscopic liver resection
Abstract
Objective: The authors used new ultrasonically activated scissors and blades in open and laparoscopic liver resections to investigate their capabilities.
Summary background data: Despite standardized techniques for liver resection, the surgical death rate ranges from 4% to 20%. Dissection of liver parenchyma may cause considerable blood loss. Further complications include liver failure, hematoma, infections, and bile leakage. The surgical technique is an important factor in preventing intraoperative and postoperative complications. Various techniques have been developed for safe and careful dissection of the liver parenchyma. In addition to blunt dissection using the "finger fracture" technique, various ultrasonic dissectors, water jet dissectors, laser systems, and specially prepared suction devices have been used, but none of these techniques can achieve complete hemostasis during dissection.
Methods: The instrument was used in open and laparoscopic liver resections. It works by means of a longitudinally vibrating blade or scissors in tissue dissection, coagulation, and preparation. Denaturation of protein and coagulation of vessels up to 2 to 3 mm is possible as a result of the vibration. In this prospective study of a consecutively sampled case series of 41 patients, the author sought to gain experience in handling this instrument and in its capabilities, and they also measured the extent of intraoperative and postoperative blood loss.
Results: The UltraCision was used for 64 open liver resections in 39 patients and for 2 laparoscopic liver resections in 2 patients. Blood loss in laparoscopic resections was less than 50 mL; in open resections it averaged 820 mL. Eleven patients (28%) needed blood transfusions. There were no biliary leakages or abscesses. One patient died after postoperative bleeding leading to fatal liver failure after 4 weeks. Handling of the instrument and cutting and coagulation quality were satisfactory.
Conclusions: The advantages over other resection techniques are limited heat and smoke generation and the lack of current flow through the patient. The handling and coagulation and cutting quality of the UltraCision appeared satisfactory and safe. The new instrument can be recommended for laparoscopic and open resections of the liver.
Similar articles
-
[Open and laparoscopic liver resection with a new ultrasound scalpel].Chirurg. 1998 Dec;69(12):1352-6. doi: 10.1007/s001040050583. Chirurg. 1998. PMID: 10023562 German.
-
Initial experience with the harmonic scalpel in liver surgery.Hepatogastroenterology. 2000 May-Jun;47(33):763-6. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000. PMID: 10919028
-
Laparoscopic liver resection compared with conventional partial hepatectomy--a prospective analysis.Hepatogastroenterology. 1998 Nov-Dec;45(24):2333-8. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998. PMID: 9951918
-
[Dissection techniques in liver surgery].Chirurg. 2001 Feb;72(2):105-12. doi: 10.1007/s001040051277. Chirurg. 2001. PMID: 11253668 Review. German.
-
[Technical aspects of laparoscopic liver surgery : Transfer from open to laparoscopic liver surgery].Chirurg. 2018 Dec;89(12):984-992. doi: 10.1007/s00104-018-0684-4. Chirurg. 2018. PMID: 29971460 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Energy sources in neonatal surgery: principles and practice.J Neonatal Surg. 2014 Apr 1;3(2):17. eCollection 2014 Apr-Jun. J Neonatal Surg. 2014. PMID: 26023488 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Ultracision Harmonic Scalpel and multifunctional tem400 instrument complement in transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a prospective study.Surg Endosc. 2004 Dec;18(12):1730-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9331-2. Epub 2004 Oct 26. Surg Endosc. 2004. PMID: 15809779 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic parenchymal division of the liver in a porcine model: comparison of the efficacy and safety of three different techniques.Surg Endosc. 2007 Feb;21(2):315-20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-0758-0. Epub 2007 Jan 6. Surg Endosc. 2007. PMID: 17219291
-
Ultrasonically activated device for parenchymal division during open hepatectomy.HPB (Oxford). 2008;10(4):234-8. doi: 10.1080/13651820802166906. HPB (Oxford). 2008. PMID: 18773104 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasonic Dissection versus Conventional Dissection for Pancreatic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:6195426. doi: 10.1155/2016/6195426. Epub 2016 Jan 10. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016. PMID: 26880891 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Rees M, Plant G, Wells J, et al. One hundred and fifty hepatic resections: evolution of a technique towards bloodless surgery. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 1526–1529. - PubMed
-
- Schröder T, Hasselgren PO, Brackett K, et al. Techniques of liver resection: Comparison of suction knife, ultrasonic dissector and contact neodymium-YAG laser. Arch Surg 1987; 122: 1166–1171. - PubMed
-
- Tranberg KG, Rigotti P, Brackett KA, et al. Liver resection: a comparison using Nd-Yag laser, an ultrasonic surgical aspirator, or blunt dissection. Am J Surg 19986; 158:368–373. - PubMed
-
- Almersjö O, Hafström L. The “suction knife”. Acta Chir Scand 1974; 140: 581–583. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources