Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Dec 1;92(11):2837-44.
doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20011201)92:11<2837::aid-cncr10093>3.0.co;2-5.

OVX1, macrophage-colony stimulating factor, and CA-125-II as tumor markers for epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a critical appraisal

Affiliations

OVX1, macrophage-colony stimulating factor, and CA-125-II as tumor markers for epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a critical appraisal

C van Haaften-Day et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Ovarian carcinoma remains the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancy in Australia, the Netherlands, and the United States. CA-125-II, the most widely used serum marker, has limited sensitivity and specificity for detecting small-volume, early-stage disease. Therefore, a panel of three serum tumor markers-OVX1, CA-125-II, and macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF)-has been used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of multiple markers for the detection of early-stage ovarian carcinoma.

Methods: Preoperative serum levels of OVX1, CA-125-II, and M-CSF were measured in 281 patients with primary ovarian epithelial tumors of different histotypes. Among these tumors, 175 were malignant, 29 were of borderline malignancy, and 77 were benign. The three markers also were measured in sera from 117 apparently healthy women. Marker levels were considered abnormal at CA-125-II > 35 U/mL, OVX1 > 7.2 U/mL, and M-CSF > 3.5 ng/mL.

Results: Among 175 women with malignant ovarian tumors, at least one of the three serum markers was elevated in 85%, whereas CA-125-II was elevated in 80% (P = 0.008). In 58 patients with Stage I ovarian carcinoma, at least one of the three serum markers was elevated in 76%, whereas CA-125 levels were elevated in 66% (P = 0.04). For patients with borderline and benign tumors, a combination of the three antigens had slightly higher sensitivity compared with CA-125-II, but the differences were not statistically significant. Among 117 apparently healthy women, CA-125-II was elevated in 4%, and one of the three markers was positive in 17%.

Conclusions: The sensitivity of a combination of three serum markers was significantly greater than the sensitivity of the CA-125-II assay alone in patients with primary ovarian epithelial tumors of different histotypes. This was true for all stages, including early-stage, potentially curable disease. When used as single markers, however, only the CA-125-II assay could distinguish invasive Stage I tumors from apparently healthy women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types