Which colon cancer screening test? A comparison of costs, effectiveness, and compliance
- PMID: 11755501
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00977-9
Which colon cancer screening test? A comparison of costs, effectiveness, and compliance
Abstract
Purpose: Recent media reports have advocated the use of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. However, colonoscopy is expensive compared with other screening modalities, such as fecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy. We sought to determine the cost effectiveness of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer at levels of compliance likely to be achieved in clinical practice.
Methods: A Markov decision model was used to examine screening strategies, including fecal occult blood testing alone, fecal occult blood testing combined with flexible sigmoidoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy alone, and colonoscopy. The timing and frequency of screening was varied to assess optimal screening intervals. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the factors that have the greatest effect on the cost effectiveness of screening.
Results: All strategies are cost effective versus no screening, at less than $20,000 per life-year saved. Direct comparison suggests that the most effective strategies are twice-lifetime colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with fecal occult blood testing. Assuming perfect compliance, flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with fecal occult blood testing is slightly more effective than twice-lifetime colonoscopy (at ages 50 and 60 years) but is substantially more expensive, with an incremental cost effectiveness of $390,000 per additional life-year saved. However, compliance with primary screening tests and colonoscopic follow-up for polyps affect screening decisions. Colonoscopy at ages 50 and 60 years is the preferred test regardless of compliance with the primary screening test. However, if follow-up colonoscopy for polyps is less than 75%, then even once-lifetime colonoscopy is preferred over most combinations of flexible sigmoidoscopy and fecal occult blood testing. Costs of colonoscopy and proportion of cancer arising from polyps also affect cost effectiveness.
Conclusions: Colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer appears preferable to current screening recommendations. Screening recommendations should be tailored to the compliance levels achievable in different practice settings.
Comment in
-
Screening for colorectal cancer--the patient and the population.Am J Med. 2001 Dec 1;111(8):662-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)01002-6. Am J Med. 2001. PMID: 11755512 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.Ann Intern Med. 2000 Oct 17;133(8):573-84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-8-200010170-00007. Ann Intern Med. 2000. PMID: 11033584
-
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening: comparison of community-based flexible sigmoidoscopy with fecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Jan;19(1):38-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03177.x. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004. PMID: 14675241
-
Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.JAMA. 2000 Oct 18;284(15):1954-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.15.1954. JAMA. 2000. PMID: 11035892
-
Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies.Cancer Control. 2015 Apr;22(2):248-58. doi: 10.1177/107327481502200219. Cancer Control. 2015. PMID: 26068773 Review.
-
The evaluation of rectal bleeding in adults. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing four diagnostic strategies.J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jan;20(1):81-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40077.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 15693933 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening with stool DNA testing in intermediate-incidence countries.BMC Cancer. 2006 May 24;6:136. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-136. BMC Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16723013 Free PMC article.
-
Early detection, curative treatment, and survival rates for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis.PLoS Med. 2014 Apr 1;11(4):e1001624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001624. eCollection 2014 Apr. PLoS Med. 2014. PMID: 24691105 Free PMC article.
-
Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies.Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 9;172(7):575-82. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.332. Arch Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22493463 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Probability model for estimating colorectal polyp progression rates.Health Care Manag Sci. 2011 Mar;14(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10729-010-9138-3. Epub 2010 Oct 5. Health Care Manag Sci. 2011. PMID: 20922484
-
Option appraisal of population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes in England.Gut. 2007 May;56(5):677-84. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.095109. Epub 2006 Dec 1. Gut. 2007. PMID: 17142648 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical