A prospective, randomized, multicenter comparative study of clinafloxacin versus a ceftriaxone-based regimen in the treatment of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia
- PMID: 11760164
- DOI: 10.1080/00365540110076633
A prospective, randomized, multicenter comparative study of clinafloxacin versus a ceftriaxone-based regimen in the treatment of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia
Abstract
In an open-label, phase 3, randomized, multicenter study, clinafloxacin (200 mg/d) was compared to ceftriaxone (2 g/d; with or without erythromycin) in 527 patients with acute community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CAP). Primary efficacy parameters were clinical cure rate and microbiologic eradication rates (by pathogen and by patient) determined 5-9 d post-therapy (test of cure; TOC). Clinical cure rates at TOC for the 2 treatment groups were equivalent in the intention-to-treat (clinafloxacin 79.3, ceftriaxone 78.6%), clinically evaluable (clinafloxacin 88.1, ceftriaxone 85.0%), modified intention-to-treat (clinafloxacin 82.6, ceftriaxone 86.9%) and microbiologically evaluable populations (clinafloxacin 86.2, ceftriaxone 86.2%). Microbiologic eradication rates were similar in the 2 treatment groups. Both drugs were tolerated. Treatment of hospitalized CAP patients with clinafloxacin is a reasonable choice, especially when a resistant pathogen is anticipated.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous