Parents' perspectives on the MMR immunisation: a focus group study
- PMID: 11761204
- PMCID: PMC1314147
Parents' perspectives on the MMR immunisation: a focus group study
Abstract
Background: The uptake of the combined measles, mumps and rubella immunisation (MMR) in Britain has fallen since 1998, when a link was hypothesised with the development of bowel disorders and childhood autism. Despite reassurances about the safety of MMR, uptake levels remain lower than optimal. We need to understand what influences parents' decisions on whether to accept MMR or not so that health professionals can provide a service responsive to their needs.
Aim: To investigate what influences parents' decisions on whether to accept or refuse the primary MMR immunisation and the impact of the recent controversy over its safety.
Design: Qualitative study using focus group discussions.
Setting: Forty-eight parents, whose youngest child was between 14 months and three years old, attended groups at community halls in six localities in Avon and Gloucestershire.
Methods: Purposive sampling strategy was used to include parents from a variety of socioeconomic backgrounds. Three groups comprised parents who had accepted MMR and three groups comprised parents who had refused MMR. Data analysis used modified grounded theory techniques incorporating the constant comparative method.
Results: All parents felt that the decision about MMR was difficult and stressful, and experienced unwelcome pressure from health professionals to comply. Parents were not convinced by Department of Health reassurances that MMR was the safest and best option for their children and many had accepted MMR unwillingly. Four key factors influenced parents' decisions: (a) beliefs about the risks and benefits of MMR compared with contracting the diseases, (b) information from the media and other sources about the safety of MMR, (c) confidence and trust in the advice of health professionals and attitudes towards compliance with this advice, and (d) views on the importance of individual choice within Government policy on immunisation.
Conclusions: Parents wanted up-to-date information about the risks and benefits of MMR to be available in advance of their immunisation appointment. Many parents did not have confidence in the recommendations of health professionals because they were aware that GPs needed to reach immunisation targets. Most parents would, however, welcome more open discussion about immunisation with health professionals.
Comment in
-
MMR and the age of unreason.Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Nov;51(472):875-6. Br J Gen Pract. 2001. PMID: 11761198 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Risks and benefits of MMR.Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Mar;52(476):234. Br J Gen Pract. 2002. PMID: 12030668 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Parents found it difficult to obtain objective information and advice about the combined mumps, measles, and rubella vaccine.Evid Based Nurs. 2002 Oct;5(4):122. doi: 10.1136/ebn.5.4.122. Evid Based Nurs. 2002. PMID: 12402825 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
MMR vaccination: answers to some parents' questions.J Fam Health Care. 2002;12(6):151-3. J Fam Health Care. 2002. PMID: 12630143
-
Predicting parents' decisions on MMR immunisation: a mixed method investigation.Fam Pract. 2005 Dec;22(6):658-62. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi066. Epub 2005 Jul 15. Fam Pract. 2005. PMID: 16024553
-
Parental confidence in measles, mumps and rubella vaccine: evidence from vaccine coverage and attitudinal surveys.Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Nov;52(484):912-6. Br J Gen Pract. 2002. PMID: 12434960 Free PMC article.
-
Factors underlying suboptimal childhood immunisation.Vaccine. 2006 Nov 30;24(49-50):7030-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.06.060. Epub 2006 Jul 13. Vaccine. 2006. PMID: 16890330 Review.
-
Risk, its perception and the media: the MMR controversy.Community Pract. 2008 Jul;81(7):22-5. Community Pract. 2008. PMID: 18655642 Review.
Cited by
-
Ethics and Childhood Vaccination Policy in the United States.Am J Public Health. 2016 Feb;106(2):273-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302952. Epub 2015 Dec 21. Am J Public Health. 2016. PMID: 26691123 Free PMC article.
-
Communicating antimicrobial resistance and stewardship in the national press: Lessons from sepsis awareness campaigns.J Infect. 2019 Feb;78(2):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 5. J Infect. 2019. PMID: 30194956 Free PMC article.
-
Imitation dynamics predict vaccinating behaviour.Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Aug 22;272(1573):1669-75. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3153. Proc Biol Sci. 2005. PMID: 16087421 Free PMC article.
-
Clinician Communication to Address Vaccine Hesitancy.Pediatr Clin North Am. 2023 Apr;70(2):309-319. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2022.11.008. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2023. PMID: 36841598 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perspectives on the Measles, Mumps and Rubella Vaccination among Somali Mothers in Stockholm.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 1;15(11):2428. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112428. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30388799 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical