Comparison of different approaches used to regulate odours around the world
- PMID: 11762488
Comparison of different approaches used to regulate odours around the world
Abstract
A number of different countries, and states and local regulatory agencies within countries, have struggled with developing effective odour regulations or guidelines. The challenge is to develop regulations or guidelines that both avoid odour annoyance conditions and are not excessively conservative. This paper will present highlights of odour regulations or guidelines in Europe, Asia, Australia, New Zealand and North America. A comparison between the different approaches will be presented. With a number of countries reporting an increase in complaints due to odours, the field of odour assessment is rapidly evolving. Complaints due to odours from livestock facilities are also significantly increasing in many countries. A comparison of approaches used to regulate livestock operations is also included in the paper. The potential impact of European olfactometry standardisation efforts to existing assumptions about odour annoyance or nuisance levels is analysed.
Similar articles
-
Recent odour regulation developments in Flanders: ambient odour quality standards based on dose-response relationships.Water Sci Technol. 2001;44(9):103-10. Water Sci Technol. 2001. PMID: 11762449
-
A review of odour impact criteria in selected countries around the world.Chemosphere. 2017 Feb;168:1531-1570. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.160. Epub 2016 Dec 9. Chemosphere. 2017. PMID: 27939667 Review.
-
What are the areas for further research?Water Sci Technol. 2001;44(9):17-25. Water Sci Technol. 2001. PMID: 11762458
-
Environmental odours assessment from waste treatment plants: dynamic olfactometry in combination with sensorial analysers "electronic noses".Waste Manag. 2007;27(2):302-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.03.011. Waste Manag. 2007. PMID: 16766175 Review.
-
Dialogue procedures for the management of odour related community conflicts.Water Sci Technol. 2009;59(5):867-73. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.030. Water Sci Technol. 2009. PMID: 19273885
Cited by
-
Odor frequency and odor annoyance Part II: dose-response associations and their modification by hedonic tone.Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 May;81(6):683-94. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0262-4. Epub 2007 Sep 29. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008. PMID: 17906873
-
Assessment of a Novel Real-Time Bio-Liquor Circulation System for Manure Management and Mitigation of Odor Potential in Swine Farming.Animals (Basel). 2023 Dec 14;13(24):3849. doi: 10.3390/ani13243849. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38136886 Free PMC article.
-
(M)VOC and composting facilities. Part 2: (M)VOC dispersal in the environment.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2004;11(3):152-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02979669. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2004. PMID: 15259697
-
Different Ways to Apply a Measurement Instrument of E-Nose Type to Evaluate Ambient Air Quality with Respect to Odour Nuisance in a Vicinity of Municipal Processing Plants.Sensors (Basel). 2017 Nov 19;17(11):2671. doi: 10.3390/s17112671. Sensors (Basel). 2017. PMID: 29156597 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Air Pollutants Removal Using Biofiltration Technique: A Challenge at the Frontiers of Sustainable Environment.ACS Eng Au. 2022 Oct 19;2(5):378-396. doi: 10.1021/acsengineeringau.2c00020. Epub 2022 Jun 3. ACS Eng Au. 2022. PMID: 36281334 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical