[Experimental examination for optimized stabilisation of trochanteric femur fractures, intra- or extramedullary implant localisation and influence of femur neck component profile on cut-out risk]
- PMID: 11766660
- DOI: 10.1007/s001040170041
[Experimental examination for optimized stabilisation of trochanteric femur fractures, intra- or extramedullary implant localisation and influence of femur neck component profile on cut-out risk]
Abstract
Introduction: Fractures of the proximal femur are typical injuries of the elderly. Therefore immediate restoration of weight-bearing capacity and prevention of local complications with the need for of secondary surgical procedures are very important.
Methods: In an experimental test the weight-bearing capacity under alternating load up to 2,000 N and 4,000 cycles was analysed in the newest implants for extramedullary fixation (the DHS with lateral buttress plate, DHS) and for intramedullary fixation (the gliding nail, GN). If no instability occurred a static maximum load test was performed. To avoid the influence of other variables the tests were performed with sowbone femora with A2, A31, (AO classification) subtrochanteric reversed and subtrochanteric transverse osteotomies. To analyse the influence of long term alternating load and of the biological bone, a pair of cadaver femora were tested with 100,000 cycles of 2,000 N alternating load after GN and DHS osteosynthesis. In a second examination the influence of the profile of the femur neck component on the migration and cut-out risk was tested. Nine head and neck parts of sowbone femora with a A2 osteotomy 1,000 alternating load tests at 1,000 and 1,500 N were performed after GN I beam plate, gamma nail and PFN screw fixation. Additionally, three pairs of cadaver femora were tested with 6,000 cycles from 1,000-3,500 N of alternating load comparing GN vs gamma, GN vs PFN and gamma vs PFN to avoid influence of the biological variability on the ranking.
Results: The weight-bearing capacity of the GN (4,230-5,557 N) was about 100% higher than that of the DHS (2,465-3,049 N). The total deformation was 1/3 higher for the DHS (17.3 +/- 2.06 mm) than for the GN (10.73 +/- 4,33 mm). After 100,000 alternating load cycles no instability and a total deformation of 13.3 mm was found for the GN, but for the DHS instability occurred after 15,800 cycles. The migration of the I-beam GN plate at 1,000 N in sowbone femora was 0.7 mm for the gamma screw 1.69 mm and for the PFN 2 mm but one cut-out was observed. At 1,500 N the difference are even higher, all three PFN showed a cut-out and in two of the three gamma screws rotation of the head and neck around the screw was observed. In the cadaver tests similar differences were found with a migration at least double that of the GN I beam plate for the gamma screw and the PFN double-screw fixation. There was no difference between the gamma and PFN fixation in the cadaver pair test.
Similar articles
-
["Cutting out" in pertrochanteric fractures--problem of osteoporosis?].Unfallchirurg. 2007 May;110(5):425-32. doi: 10.1007/s00113-007-1248-0. Unfallchirurg. 2007. PMID: 17361444 German.
-
Relevance of osteotomy and implant characteristics in inter- and subtrochanteric osteotomies. Experimental examination under alternating and static load after stabilisation with different devices including gamma nail osteosynthesis.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1993;113(1):5-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00440587. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1993. PMID: 8117512 Clinical Trial.
-
[Stabilisation of unstable trochanteric femoral fractures. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) with trochanteric stabilisation plate vs. proximal femur nail (PFN)].Unfallchirurg. 2003 Jan;106(1):39-47. doi: 10.1007/s00113-002-0476-6. Unfallchirurg. 2003. PMID: 12552392 German.
-
[Therapeutic possibilities in trochanteric fractures. Safe--fast--stable].Orthopade. 2000 Apr;29(4):294-301. doi: 10.1007/s001320050450. Orthopade. 2000. PMID: 10851690 Review. German.
-
[Trochanteric femoral fractures: anatomy, biomechanics and choice of implants].Unfallchirurg. 2011 Jun;114(6):491-500. doi: 10.1007/s00113-011-1973-2. Unfallchirurg. 2011. PMID: 21656037 Review. German.
Cited by
-
["Cutting out" in pertrochanteric fractures--problem of osteoporosis?].Unfallchirurg. 2007 May;110(5):425-32. doi: 10.1007/s00113-007-1248-0. Unfallchirurg. 2007. PMID: 17361444 German.
-
Intramedullary Nail or Primary Arthroplasty? A System Review and Meta-Analysis on the Prognosis of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Based on Randomized Controlled Trials.Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2022 Aug 6;13:21514593221118212. doi: 10.1177/21514593221118212. eCollection 2022. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2022. PMID: 35967750 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-term results after over 17 years - Intramedullary gliding nail as treatment for traumatic femoral neck fractures.J Orthop. 2021 May 27;26:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.05.029. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug. J Orthop. 2021. PMID: 34140760 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the Sliding and Femoral Head Rotation among Three Different Femoral Head Fixation Devices for Trochanteric Fractures.Clin Orthop Surg. 2015 Sep;7(3):291-7. doi: 10.4055/cios.2015.7.3.291. Epub 2015 Aug 13. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015. PMID: 26330949 Free PMC article.
-
Intramedullary Nailing Combined with Bone Grafting for Benign Lesions of the Proximal Femur.Orthop Surg. 2017 Feb;9(1):97-102. doi: 10.1111/os.12311. Epub 2017 Mar 16. Orthop Surg. 2017. PMID: 28300344 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical