The broken stone basket: configuration and technique for removal
- PMID: 11769845
- DOI: 10.1089/089277901753284125
The broken stone basket: configuration and technique for removal
Abstract
Purpose: We investigated the ease of breakage of endoscopic stone baskets with the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) laser and their resultant configuration. More importantly, possible safe methods of retrieval were evaluated.
Materials and methods: Endoscopic stone baskets from Bard (Platinum Class 2.4F Flat and 3.0F Helical Wire), Cook (3.2F Captura, 3.2F Atlas, 3.0F N-Circle, 4.5F N-Force), and Microvasive (2.4F Zero Tip, 3.0F Gemini, 3.0F Segura) were broken once using the holmium:YAG laser. The energy (kJ) required to break one of the wires was recorded. Configuration was documented using photographs. Baskets were disassembled and assessed for extraction through a 7F open-ended catheter, an 8F/10F set, and a 20F peel-away sheath.
Results: Tipless baskets (N-Circle, Zero Tip) broke the easiest (range 0.02-0.03 kJ). Tipped baskets (Segura, Platinum Class Flat and Helical, Gemini, Captura, N-Force, Atlas) were more resistant, but all broke within the range (0.06-0.78 kJ) typically used for intracorporeal lithotripsy. Broken segments of wire tended to protrude outward, with tipless baskets having less change in configuration than tipped baskets. Tipless baskets could easily be pulled into any of the extracting devices, whereas tipped baskets could not.
Conclusions: Baskets break at typical holmium:YAG intracorporeal lithotripsy energy settings. Tipless baskets break easiest and assume a safer configuration. Tipless baskets are extracted easily through a 7F open-ended catheter, 8F/10F set, or 20F sheath, while tipped baskets are unable to be extracted through any of these.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of tipless and helical baskets in an in vitro ureteral model.Urology. 2004 Sep;64(3):435-8; discussion 438. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.063. Urology. 2004. PMID: 15351559
-
Radial dilation force of tipless and helical stone baskets.J Endourol. 2004 Dec;18(10):946-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.946. J Endourol. 2004. PMID: 15801359
-
Tipless Nitinol Stone Baskets: Comparison of Penetration Force, Radial Dilation Force, Opening Dynamics, and Deflection.Urology. 2017 May;103:256-260. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 16. Urology. 2017. PMID: 28104422
-
Small diameter, actively deflectable, flexible ureteropyeloscopy.J Urol. 1998 Nov;160(5):1648-53; discussion 1653-4. J Urol. 1998. PMID: 9783924 Review.
-
[Flexible ureteroscopy and holmium-Yag laser: material and technique].Prog Urol. 2006 Feb;16(1):19-24. Prog Urol. 2006. PMID: 16526534 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Damage of stone baskets by endourologic lithotripters: a laboratory study of 5 lithotripters and 4 basket types.Adv Urol. 2013;2013:632790. doi: 10.1155/2013/632790. Epub 2013 Oct 30. Adv Urol. 2013. PMID: 24288527 Free PMC article.
-
[Endourological lithotripsy for stone removal: accidental fragmentation of dormia basket and guidewire - a brief overview].Urologe A. 2010 Nov;49(11):1365-7. doi: 10.1007/s00120-010-2383-8. Urologe A. 2010. PMID: 20824266 Review. German.
-
Could titanium oxide coating from a sol-gel process make stone baskets more resistant to laser radiation at 2.1 μm?J Negat Results Biomed. 2012 Oct 19;11:15. doi: 10.1186/1477-5751-11-15. J Negat Results Biomed. 2012. PMID: 23083224 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources