The tendon organs of cat medial gastrocnemius: significance of motor unit type and size for the activation of Ib afferents

Abstract

1. Histological and histochemical studies suggest that each tendon organ in a mixed mammalian muscle should be particularly responsive to the contraction of a discrete number of motor units (ca. ten to fifteen), each with differing mechanical properties. This report describes physiological experiments that demonstrate this arrangement for the tendon organs of cat medial gastrocnemius. 2. No correlations could be found between the intensity of discharge of a single tendon organ and the contraction strengths of motor units whose contraction excited the receptor. Tendon organs were found to be as responsive to contraction of small slow twitch units as they were to contraction of larger fast twitch units. Taking the data as a whole, the apparent sensitivity of the receptors during motor unit contractions (pps/force recorded at the tendon) was inversely related to the contraction strengths of the motor units. 3. These findings are discussed in relation to recent evidence on the territory of single motor units in medial gastrocnemius and the force producing capabilities of their individual muscle fibres. It is concluded that in general each motor unit, whose contraction excites a given receptor, contributes one muscle fibre to the receptor capsule. Further, it appears that the various excitatory effects of those muscle fibres inserting into a given receptor capsule are not simply related to their relative contraction strengths but also depend on the details of the mechanical coupling between each fibre and the Ib afferent receptor endings. 4. The results of an ensemble analysis show that despite the lack of correlation between the intensity of tendon organ discharge and the force developed at the tendon during contraction of different motor units, a correlation does appear when the responses of several tendon organs and the forces developed by the motor units which excite them are summed progressively. This finding has implications for the recruitment order of motor units in that the profile of the collective Ib response is shown to differ according to whether motor unit forces are summed randomly or in order of increasing contraction strengths.