Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Jan;99(1):69-74.
doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01653-2.

Computer-assisted virtual urethral pressure profile in the assessment of female genuine stress incontinence

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Computer-assisted virtual urethral pressure profile in the assessment of female genuine stress incontinence

Matthias Wolters et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To compare computer-assisted virtual urethral pressure profile changes between women with and without genuine stress incontinence.

Methods: A full urogynecologic assessment including conventional urodynamic measurements and a clinical stress test were carried out. Computer-assisted virtual urethral pressure profile uses conventional urethral pressure profile measurements during stress, with the only change being that withdrawal of the catheter is stopped at distinct points along the whole urethra while the patient coughs. Cough-related changes of maximal urethral closure pressure, functional urethral length, and area under the urethral closure pressure curve were determined.

Results: Sixty-one women were enrolled in our study: 30 symptom-free women (group A) were continent, and genuine stress incontinence was present in 31 patients (group B) complaining of urinary loss. Significant differences between group A and group B women were found for all parameters of computer-assisted virtual urethral pressure profile including maximal urethral closure pressure (91.59 +/- 39.00 versus 20.70 +/- 22.61 cm H(2)O; P <.001), functional urethral length (31.81 +/- 9.02 versus 10.83 +/- 10.76 mm; P <.001), and the area under the urethral closure pressure curve (2036 +/- 1025.29 versus 253 +/- 206.69 cm H(2)O x mm; P <.001).

Conclusion: Computer-assisted virtual urethral pressure profile is a new application of urethral pressure profile measurements during stress. Our data show significant differences between continent women and patients with genuine stress incontinence. Further studies are needed to assess the potential of computer-assisted virtual urethral pressure profile for diagnosing genuine stress incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer