Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Jan;19(1):57-62.
doi: 10.1136/emj.19.1.57.

A randomised trial to investigate the efficacy of magnesium sulphate for refractory ventricular fibrillation

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomised trial to investigate the efficacy of magnesium sulphate for refractory ventricular fibrillation

T B Hassan et al. Emerg Med J. 2002 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) remains the most salvageable rhythm in patients suffering a cardiopulmonary arrest (CA). However, outcome remains poor if there is no response to initial defibrillation. Some evidence suggests that intravenous magnesium may prove to be an effective antiarrhythmic agent in such circumstances.

Study hypothesis: Intravenous magnesium sulphate given early in the resuscitation phase for patients in refractory VF (VF after 3 DC shocks) or recurring VF will significantly improve their outcome, defined as a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and discharge from hospital alive.

Design: A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Pre-defined primary and secondary endpoints were ROSC at the scene or in accident and emergency (A&E) and discharge from hospital alive respectively. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTION: Patients in CA with refractory or recurrent VF treated in the prehospital phase by the county emergency medical services and/or in the A&E department. One hundred and five patients with refractory VF were recruited over a 15 month period and randomised to receive either 2-4 g of magnesium sulphate or placebo intravenously.

Results: Fifty two patients received magnesium treatment and 53 received placebo. The two groups were matched for most parameters including sex, response time for arrival at scene and airway interventions. There were no significant differences between magnesium and placebo for ROSC at the scene or A&E (17% v 13%). The 4% difference had 95% confidence intervals (CI) ranging from -10% to +18%. For patients being alive to discharge from hospital (4% v 2%) the difference was 2% (95% CI -7% to +11%). After adjustment for potential confounding variables (age, witnessed arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and system response time), the odds ratio (95% CI) for ROSC in patients treated with magnesium as compared with placebo was 1.69 (0.54 to 5.30).

Conclusion: Intravenous magnesium given early in patients suffering CA with refractory or recurrent VF did not significantly improve the proportion with a ROSC or who were discharged from hospital alive.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Acad Emerg Med. 1995 Apr;2(4):264-73 - PubMed
    1. Resuscitation. 1997 Nov;35(3):237-41 - PubMed
    1. Am Heart J. 1989 Jan;117(1):151-9 - PubMed
    1. Magnesium. 1989;8(5-6):299-306 - PubMed
    1. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Feb;19(2):179-86 - PubMed

Publication types