Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Dec;17(4):350-8.
doi: 10.1097/00002508-200112000-00010.

Relations between behavioral and cardiac autonomic reactivity to acute pain in preterm neonates

Affiliations

Relations between behavioral and cardiac autonomic reactivity to acute pain in preterm neonates

S J Morison et al. Clin J Pain. 2001 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess relations and concordance between behavioral and physiologic reactivity to pain in preterm neonates at 32 weeks postconceptional age as a function of gestational age at birth.

Setting: Level III neonatal intensive care unit.

Design/patients: The study group comprised 136 preterm neonates (mean [range] birthweight, 1,020 g [445-1,500 g]: gestational age at birth, 28 weeks [23-32 weeks]) separated into three groups according to gestational age at birth as follows: 23 to 26 weeks (n = 48), 27 to 29 weeks (n = 52), and 30 to 32 weeks (n = 36).

Outcome measures: Reactivity to routine blood collection at 32 weeks postconceptional age was assessed using bedside-recorded behavioral and autonomic measures. Coders who were blinded to the study design scored behavioral responses (facial activity using the Neonatal Facial Coding System, sleep/waking state, and finger splay). Autonomic reactivity was assessed by change in heart rate and spectral analysis of heart rate variability (change in low-frequency and high-frequency power, and the ratio of low-frequency to high-frequency power during blood collection).

Results: Facial activity and state correlated moderately with change in heart rate across gestational age groups (r = 0.41-0.62). Facial activity and state did not correlate significantly with change in low-frequency and high-frequency power, or the ratio of low-frequency to high-frequency power (r = 0.00-0.31). Finger splay did not correlate with any autonomic recording (r = 0.03-0.41). Concordance between established biobehavioral measures of pain revealed individual differences. Although some neonates showed high behavioral but low physiologic reactivity, other neonates displayed the opposite reaction; however, the majority displayed concordant reactions.

Conclusions: The study findings confirm the value of measuring domains independently, especially in neonates born at a very young gestational age.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Associations between behavioral and autonomic reactivity at 32 weeks postconceptional age. Symbols greater than r = 0.4 are significant at p <0.01. NFCS, Neonatal Facial Coding System at squeeze; state, state at squeeze; HR, change in heart rate from baseline to squeeze; LFP, change in low-frequency power from baseline to squeeze; HFP, change in high-frequency power from baseline to squeeze; LFP/HFP, ratio of LFP to HFP at squeeze.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Associations between finger splay and autonomic reactivity at 32 weeks postconceptional age. Symbols greater than r = 0.25 are significant at p <0.01. Splay, finger splay at squeeze; HR, change in heart rate from baseline to squeeze; LFP, change in low-frequency power from baseline to squeeze; HFP, change in high-frequency power from baseline to squeeze; LFP/HFP, ratio of LFP to HFP at squeeze.
FIG. 3
FIG. 3
Associations among behavioral reactivity measures at 32 weeks postconceptional age. Symbols greater than r = 0.25 are significant at p ≤ 0.05. NFCS, Neonatal Facial Coding System; state, state at squeeze; splay, finger splay at squeeze.
FIG. 4
FIG. 4
Associations among autonomic reactivity measures at 32 weeks postconceptional age. Symbols at r = 0.3 or greater are significant at p <0.05. HR, change in heart rate from baseline to squeeze; LFP, change in low-frequency power from baseline to squeeze; HFP, change in high-frequency power from baseline to squeeze; LFP/HFP, ratio of LFP to HFP at squeeze.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stevens BJ, Johnston CC, Grunau RVE. Issues of assessment of pain and discomfort in neonates. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1995;24:849–55. - PubMed
    1. Stevens B, Johnston CC, Petryshen P, et al. The premature infant pain profile. Clin J Pain. 1996;12:13–22. - PubMed
    1. Franck LS, Miaskowski C. Measurement of neonatal responses to painful stimuli: a research review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997;14:343–78. - PubMed
    1. Abu-Saad HH, Bours GJJW, Stevens B, et al. Assessment of pain in the neonate. Semin Perinatol. 1998;22:402–16. - PubMed
    1. Grunau RE. Current issues in infant pain assessment; Paper presented at the 9th World Congress on Pain; Vienna. August, 1999.

Publication types