Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Jan 12;324(7329):87-9.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.87.

Brief intervention during hospital admission to help patients to give up smoking after myocardial infarction and bypass surgery: randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Brief intervention during hospital admission to help patients to give up smoking after myocardial infarction and bypass surgery: randomised controlled trial

Peter Hajek et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate a smoking cessation intervention that can be routinely delivered to smokers admitted with cardiac problems.

Design: Randomised controlled trial of usual care compared with intervention delivered on hospital wards by cardiac rehabilitation nurses.

Setting: Inpatient wards in 17 hospitals in England.

Participants: 540 smokers admitted to hospital after myocardial infarction or for cardiac bypass surgery who expressed interest in stopping smoking.

Intervention: Brief verbal advice and standard booklet (usual care). Intervention lasting 20-30 minutes including carbon monoxide reading, special booklet, quiz, contact with other people giving up, declaration of commitment to give up, sticker in patient's notes (intervention group).

Main outcome measures: Continuous abstinence at six weeks and 12 months determined by self report and by biochemical validation at these end points. Feasibility of the intervention and delivery of its components.

Results: After six weeks 151 (59%) and 159 (60%) patients remained abstinent in the control and intervention group, respectively (P=0.84). After 12 months the figures were 102 (41%) and 94 (37%) (P=0.40). Recruitment was slow, and delivery of the intervention was inconsistent, raising concerns about the feasibility of the intervention within routine care. Patients who received the declaration of commitment component were almost twice as likely to remain abstinent than those who did not receive it (P<0.01). Low dependence on tobacco and high motivation to give up were the main independent predictors of positive outcome. Patients who had had bypass surgery were over twice as likely to return to smoking as patients who had had a myocardial infarction.

Conclusions: Single session interventions delivered within routine care may have insufficient power to influence highly dependent smokers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wilson K, Gibson N, Willan A, Cook D. Effect of smoking cessation on mortality after myocardial infarction: meta-analysis of cohort studies. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:939–944. - PubMed
    1. Department of Health and Human Services (US) The health benefits of smoking cessation: a report of the surgeon general. Rockville, MD: Public Health Service, Office on Smoking and Health; 1990. - PubMed
    1. Cavender JB, Rogers WJ, Fisher LD, Gersh BJ, Coggin CJ, Myers WO. Effects of smoking on survival and morbidity in patients randomized to medical or surgical therapy in the coronary artery surgery study: 10-year follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:287–294. - PubMed
    1. Jones RM, Rosen M, Seymour L. Smoking and anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1987;42:1–2. - PubMed
    1. Dobson AJ, Alexander HM, Heller RF, Lloyd DM. How soon after quitting smoking does risk of heart attack decline? J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:1247–1253. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms