Exploring medication use to seek concordance with 'non-adherent' patients: a qualitative study

Abstract

Background: 'Concordance' has been proposed as a new approach towards sub-optimal medication use; however, it is not clear how this may be achieved in practice.

Aim: To develop a strategy for understanding sub-optimal medication use and seek concordance during primary care consultations.

Design: A developmental qualitative study using a modified action research design.

Setting: Three Scottish general practices.

Method: Patients using treatment sub-optimally and having poor clinical control were offered extended consultations to explore their situation. Their authority to make treatment decisions was made explicit throughout. Clinicians refined a consultation model during ten 'Balint-style' meetings that ran in parallel with the analysis. The analysis included all material from the consultations, meetings, and discussion with patients after the intervention.

Results: Three practitioners recorded 59 consultations with 24 adult patients. A six-stage process was developed, first to understand and then to discuss existing medication use. Understanding of medication use was best established using a structured exploration of patients' beliefs about their illness and medication. Four problematic issues were identified: understanding, acceptance, level of personal control, and motivation. Pragmatic interventions were developed that were tailored to the issues identified. Of the 22 subjects usefully engaged in the process, 14 had improved clinical control or medication use three months after intervention ceased.

Conclusions: A sensitive, structured exploration of patients' beliefs can elucidate useful insights that explain medication use and expose barriers to change. Identifying and discussing these barriers improved management for some. A model to assist such concordant prescribing is presented.