This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 2001 Nov 17;323(7322):1188.

Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. Two issues were simplified

G ter Riet, A G Kessels, L M Bachmann

PMID: 11794254

Comment

Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. Two issues were simplified

G ter Riet et al. BMJ. 2001.

. 2001 Nov 17;323(7322):1188.

Authors

G ter Riet, A G Kessels, L M Bachmann

PMID: 11794254

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests.
Deeks JJ. Deeks JJ. BMJ. 2001 Jul 21;323(7305):157-62. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11463691 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. Odds ratio is not independent of prevalence.
Blackman NJ. Blackman NJ. BMJ. 2001 Nov 17;323(7322):1188. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11711421 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Gynaecologists blaze the trail in primary studies and systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
Johnson NP, Khan KS. Johnson NP, et al. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Feb;49(1):71-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.00996.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009. PMID: 19281584
We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews.
Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM. Zwinderman AH, et al. Stat Med. 2008 Feb 28;27(5):687-97. doi: 10.1002/sim.2992. Stat Med. 2008. PMID: 17611957
Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Reitsma JB, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Oct;58(10):982-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005. PMID: 16168343 Review.
Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests.
Deeks JJ. Deeks JJ. BMJ. 2001 Jul 21;323(7305):157-62. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11463691 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Optimizing the diagnostic work-up of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections.
Knottnerus BJ, Bindels PJ, Geerlings SE, Moll van Charante EP, ter Riet G. Knottnerus BJ, et al. BMC Fam Pract. 2008 Dec 8;9:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-9-64. BMC Fam Pract. 2008. PMID: 19063737 Free PMC article.
Volatile organic compounds analysis as a potential novel screening tool for colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhou W, Tao J, Li J, Tao S. Zhou W, et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 2;99(27):e20937. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020937. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32629696 Free PMC article.
Cell-free DNA in blood and urine as a diagnostic tool for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis.
Wang XS, Zhao MQ, Zhang L, Kong DJ, Ding XZ, Hu XC, Yang JQ, Gao SG. Wang XS, et al. Am J Transl Res. 2018 Jul 15;10(7):1935-1948. eCollection 2018. Am J Transl Res. 2018. PMID: 30093933 Free PMC article. Review.

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.