Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Nov;38(11):733-6.

[A preliminary study on hepatitis E virus antibody IgG and IgM for the diagnosis of acute hepatitis E]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 11798711

[A preliminary study on hepatitis E virus antibody IgG and IgM for the diagnosis of acute hepatitis E]

[Article in Chinese]
K Li et al. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 1999 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the significance of hepatitis E virus antibody (anti-HEV) IgG and IgM for the diagnosis of acute hepatitis E.

Methods: Acute phase sera from a total of 143 patients with sporadic hepatitis E in 7 cities of China were determined for anti-HEV IgM and IgG by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA). 359 serial sera of 56 patients with hepatitis E and 68 serial sera of 4 rhesus macaques experimentally infected with hepatitis E virus (HEV) were also detected for anti-HEV IgG and IgM.

Results: In the 143 patients the positive rate of anti-HEV IgG was 100.0%, which was significantly higher than that of anti-HEV IgM (73.4%, 105/143). 97.2% of anti-HEV IgG positive patients had a titer over 1:40. The positive rate of anti-HEV IgM increased with the titer of anti-HEV IgG in sera. It was 0% (0/4), 44.4% (8/18) and 80.2% (97/121), respectively in patients with the anti-HEV IgG titer of 1:20, 1:40 and >or=1:80 (P < 0.001). All the anti-HEV IgM positive patients were also anti-HEV IgG positive. No patients were found to be anti-HEV IgM positive alone. Anti-HEV IgG was detected as early as 2 days after onset of the disease, with a cumulative positive seroconversion rate of 100% by 1 month. The negative seroconversion rate of anti-HEV IgG increased with course of the disease and 43.3% of the patients lost their anti-HEV IgG by 6 months after illness. Though anti-HEV IgM also seroconverted at the same time as anti-HEV IgG, its cumulative positive seroconversion rate was only 71.4% and declined rapidly. Up to 37.5% of anti-HEV IgM positive patients became negative by 1 month after onset. Similar antibody responses were observed in 4 rhesus macaques experimentally infected with HEV.

Conclusion: It is suggested that as a result of the poor sensitivity of currently available anti-HEV IgM EIA kits, anti-HEV IgG will be a more reliable marker for the diagnosis of acute hepatitis E as compared with anti-HEV IgM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources