Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001:1:13.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-1-13. Epub 2001 Dec 18.

Determinants of abstract acceptance for the Digestive Diseases Week--a cross sectional study

A Timmer  1 , R J Hilsden, L R Sutherland
Affiliations

Determinants of abstract acceptance for the Digestive Diseases Week--a cross sectional study

A Timmer et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2001.

Abstract

Background: The Digestive Diseases Week (DDW) is the major meeting for presentation of research in gastroenterology. The acceptance of an abstract for presentation at this meeting is the most important determinant of subsequent full publication. We wished to examine the determinants of abstract acceptance for this meeting.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed, based on abstracts submitted to the DDW. All 17,205 abstracts submitted from 1992 to 1995 were reviewed for acceptance, country of origin and research type (controlled clinical trials (CCT), other clinical research (OCR), basic science (BSS)). A random sub-sample (n = 1,000) was further evaluated for formal abstract quality, statistical significance of study results and sample size.

Results: 326 CCT, 455 OCR and 219 BSS abstracts were evaluated in detail. Abstracts from N/W Europe (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.6), S/E Europe (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.6) and non-Western countries (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.5) were less likely to be accepted than North-American contributions when controlling for research type. In addition, the OR for the acceptance for studies with negative results as compared to those with positive results was 0.4 (95% CI 0.3-0.7). A high abstract quality score was also weakly associated with acceptance rates (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-2.0).

Conclusions: North-American contributions and reports with statistically positive results have higher acceptance rates at the AGA. Formal abstract quality was also predictive for acceptance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Duchini A, Genta RM. From abstract to peer-reviewed article: the fate of abstracts submitted to the DDW. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:A12.
    1. Timmer A, Blum T, Lankisch PG. Publication bias in gastroenterological research. Pancreas. 2001;23:212–215. doi: 10.1097/00006676-200108000-00012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1994;272:158–162. doi: 10.1001/jama.272.2.158. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Bellefeuille C, Morrison CA, Tannock IF. The fate of abstracts submitted to a cancer meeting: factors which influence presentation and subsequent publication. Ann Oncol. 1992;3:187–191. - PubMed
    1. Dickersin K, Chan S, Chalmers TC, Sacks HS, Smith HJ. Publication bias and clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1987;8:343–353. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(87)90155-3. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources