Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002 Jan-Feb;16(3):135-41.
doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-16.3.135.

Do social influences contribute to occupational differences in quitting smoking and attitudes toward quitting?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Do social influences contribute to occupational differences in quitting smoking and attitudes toward quitting?

Glorian Sorensen et al. Am J Health Promot. 2002 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine occupational differences in social influences supporting quitting smoking and their relationships to intentions and self-efficacy to quit smoking and to quitting.

Design: Data were collected as part of a large worksite cancer prevention intervention trial.

Setting: Forty-four worksites.

Subjects: Subjects included 2626 smokers from a total baseline survey sample of 11,456 employees (response rate = 63%).

Measures: Differences by job category in social support for quitting, pressure to quit smoking, rewards for quitting, and nonacceptability of smoking were measured using mixed model analysis of variance and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Their association to self-efficacy, intention to quit, and quitting smoking was assessed using mixed model analysis of variance and linear logistic regression modeling.

Results: Compared with other workers, blue-collar workers reported less pressure to quit (p = .0001), social support for quitting (p = .0001), and nonacceptability of smoking among their coworkers (p < .001). Intention to quit was associated with higher levels of social pressure to quit smoking (p = .0001) and social support for quitting (p = .002). Self-efficacy was associated with social pressure to quit (p = .0001), social support for quitting (p = .004), and perceiving greater rewards for quitting (p = .0001).

Conclusions: Although these results are limited somewhat by response and attrition rates, these results suggest that differing social environments may contribute to the differences by occupational category in smoking prevalence and smoking cessation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources