The central oval of the face: tridimensional endoscopic rejuvenation
- PMID: 11802575
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-13597
The central oval of the face: tridimensional endoscopic rejuvenation
Abstract
The central oval of the face is a distinct anatomic and aesthetic unit. Early signs of aging and advanced features of aging are manifested primarily in this unit. Standard face lift techniques are ineffective in treating this area. Intermediate layer (sub-SMAS, [superior musculo-aponeurotic system], intermuscular, etc.) and deep layer (subperiosteal) techniques were developed to treat this rather difficult part of the face. All variations of the intermediate layer technique have negative features, primarily safety issues related to potential nerve-muscle injury and protracted facial edema. Early described subperiosteal techniques (open, first generation endoscopic) were also associated with these types of complications. The author has outlined 14 principles of the ideal technique for the rejuvenation of the central oval. The advances and modifications to the first and second generation endoscopic central oval rejuvenation method comply with these principles. There are several principles that distinctly separate it from all other techniques: (1) direct approach to the central oval; (2) interconnected subperiosteal plane of dissection to the upper and midface; (3) use of small hidden slit incisions; (4) absence of eyelid incisions; (5) use of endoscopic techniques; and (6) absence of traction on skin or SMAS from the peripheral hemicircle. Another important advance made in this approach is the manipulation of soft tissues in the brow, glabella, cheek, and chin to provide a tridimensional rejuvenation. This was lacking in all previously described procedures. This method has been used with several modifications in over 500 patients. Aesthetic results have been excellent, with minimal sequela and a low complication rate. The subset of patients in whom this third generation endoscopic subperiosteal approach has been used have also had a three-dimensional remodeling and enhancement. The aesthetic results and safety factors surpass all other previously described techniques done at the intermediate or deep layers of the face.
Similar articles
-
Three-dimensional endoscopic midface enhancement: a personal quest for the ideal cheek rejuvenation.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jan;109(1):329-40; discussion 341-9. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200201000-00052. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002. PMID: 11786834
-
Effects of subperiosteal midfacial elevation via an endoscopic brow-lift incision on lower facial rejuvenation.Facial Plast Surg. 2005 Feb;21(1):33-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-871761. Facial Plast Surg. 2005. PMID: 15988654
-
Evolution in techniques for endoscopic brow lift with deep temporal fixation only and lower blepharoplasty-transconjunctival fat repositioning.Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Feb;23(1):27-42; discussion 43-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-970130. Facial Plast Surg. 2007. PMID: 17330770
-
The extended minimal incision approach to midface rejuvenation.Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2005 Aug;13(3):411-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2005.04.002. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2005. PMID: 16085287 Review.
-
Contemporary deep plane rhytidectomy.Facial Plast Surg. 2011 Feb;27(1):124-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270426. Epub 2011 Jan 18. Facial Plast Surg. 2011. PMID: 21246463 Review.
Cited by
-
Development of Facial Rejuvenation Procedures: Thirty Years of Clinical Experience with Face Lifts.Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Sep;42(5):521-31. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.5.521. Epub 2015 Sep 15. Arch Plast Surg. 2015. PMID: 26430622 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical