Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1975 Sep;30(3):424-32.
doi: 10.1128/am.30.3.424-432.1975.

Formation of methyl mercury by bacteria

Formation of methyl mercury by bacteria

M K Hamdy et al. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Sep.

Abstract

Twenty-three Hg2+-resistant cultures were isolated from sediment of the Savannah River in Georgia; of these, 14 were gram-negative short rods belonging to the genera Escherichia and Enterobacter, six were gram-positive cocci (three Staphylococcus sp. and three Streptococcus sp.) and three were Bacillus sp. All the Escherichia, Enterobacter, and the Bacillus strain were more resistant to Hg2+ than the strains of staphylococci and streptococci. Adaptation using serial dilutions and concentration gradient agar plate techniques showed that it was possible to select a Hg2+-resistant strain from a parent culture identified as Enterobacter aerogenes. This culture resisted 1,200 mug of Hg2+ per ml of medium and produced methyl mercury from HgCl2, but was unable to convert Hg2+ to volatile elemental mercury (Hg0). Under constant aeration (i.e., submerged culture), slightly more methyl mercury was formed than in the absence of aeration. Production of methyl mercury was cyclic in nature and slightly decreased if DL-homocysteine was present in media, but increased with methylcobalamine. It is concluded that the bacterial production of methyl mercury may be a means of resistance and detoxification against mercurials in which inorganic Hg2+ is converted to organic form and secreted into the environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nature. 1971 Apr 16;230(5294):452-4 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1968 Feb 17;217(5129):644-6 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1967 May 26;156(3778):1114-6 - PubMed
    1. J Chromatogr. 1969 Oct 28;44(2):284-9 - PubMed
    1. Analyst. 1970 Mar;95(128):264-71 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources