Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer at a specialty center
- PMID: 11805560
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02234816
Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer at a specialty center
Abstract
Purpose: Although sphincter-preservation procedures have replaced abdominoperineal resection as the treatment of choice for rectal cancer, a subset of patients with rectal cancer will still require abdominoperineal resection. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy has been shown to reduce local recurrence, and combined modality therapy (chemoradiation) improves survival. Sharp mesorectal excision compared with the classic teaching of blunt retrorectal dissection is also an important component of local control. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the postoperative complications associated with neoadjuvant therapy in patients requiring complete rectal excision. Oncologic outcomes for all patients with abdominoperineal resection are also provided.
Methods: A prospective database of 5,634 patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between the years 1987 and 1997 was reviewed. Patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum who underwent abdominoperineal resection were identified. In 1,622 patients who were operated on for primary rectal cancer, 292 patients (18 percent) underwent abdominoperineal resection and the rest had a sphincter-preserving procedure. Ten patients were excluded from the study because of prior pelvic irradiation for other cancer (8 patients) and insufficient radiation dose (<4,000 cGy; 2 patients). Neoadjuvant radiotherapy was given to 123 patients and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy to 65 patients, whereas 94 did not receive radiotherapy. Intraoperative radiotherapy combined with preoperative radiotherapy was administered to 23 of the 123 patients given neoadjuvant radiotherapy.
Results: The duration of the operation was significantly longer in both neoadjuvant radiotherapy and intraoperative radiotherapy groups compared with the nonradiotherapy group (P = 0.01 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Estimated blood loss, mean number of blood units transfused per patient, and the percentage of patients being transfused were similar among the groups. Early postoperative complications were significantly higher in the neoadjuvant radiotherapy groups compared with the nonradiotherapy group. Late complications, overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence were not significantly different among the groups.
Conclusions: In patients with cancer of the lower one-third of the rectum, sharp pelvic dissection can result in a low rate of local recurrence even without radiotherapy. The role of preoperative radiotherapy, although associated with higher perineal wound complications, is important in increasing resectability and sphincter-preservation rate. Randomized, prospective trials will be needed to establish the role of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients undergoing sharp mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Similar articles
-
Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Jan;55(1):51-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182351c1f. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012. PMID: 22156867
-
Abdominoperineal excision following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: unfavorable prognosis even with negative circumferential resection margin.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 21;20(27):9138-45. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.9138. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 25083087 Free PMC article.
-
Short-term outcomes of the modified extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer (with videos).Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1672-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4400-x. Epub 2015 Jul 17. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26183956
-
Morbidity and mortality following abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma.Rev Invest Clin. 2001 Sep-Oct;53(5):388-95. Rev Invest Clin. 2001. PMID: 11795103 Review.
-
Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer management.World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep 7;25(33):4850-4869. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4850. World J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 31543678 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Management of the Perineal Defect after Abdominoperineal Excision.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016 Jun;29(2):160-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1580627. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016. PMID: 27247542 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of the learning curve for conformal sphincter preservation operation in the treatment of ultralow rectal cancer.World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar 30;20(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02541-1. World J Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35354489 Free PMC article.
-
Determining the optimal distal resection margin in rectal cancer patients by imaging of large pathological sections: An experimental study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 24;103(21):e38083. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038083. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 38787988 Free PMC article.
-
Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: is the pelvic drain externalization site an independent risk factor for perineal wound healing?Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:156935. doi: 10.1155/2012/156935. Epub 2012 Mar 6. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22611493 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic resection with intraoperative radiotherapy: a new step in the multimodal treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.Surg Endosc. 2007 Feb;21(2):330-2. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0783-4. Epub 2006 Nov 30. Surg Endosc. 2007. PMID: 17139455
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources