[Changes in partner relationship after organ transplantation: comparison between heart, liver, and kidney transplantation]
- PMID: 11805877
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-19663
[Changes in partner relationship after organ transplantation: comparison between heart, liver, and kidney transplantation]
Abstract
Aim: This study was conducted to delineate partnership-relation functioning over time and specifically matched to various organs such as heart, liver, and kidney.
Method: Prospective, paralleled case-control-study including patients and their respective partners before and one year after organ transplantation in 23 heart-transplant recipients, 19 liver-transplant patients, and 16 kidney-transplant recipients. To assess partnership functioning, the FB-Z (family assessment measure) of Cierpka and Frevert was used. Statistics included descriptive methods, correlations, and analysis of variance including the items "organ" and "time".
Results: Heart-transplant recipients and their partners show significant better overall measures in their partnership ratings (sum-value) in comparison to liver or kidney patients and their partners. In all patient and partner groups, except in kidney-transplant recipients a significant deterioration over time is discernible in the subscales role performance and emotionality. In respect to the item "organ" significant differences were found in overall functioning and the subscale communication where heart-transplant recipients and their partners have significant better functioning compared to kidney or liver transplant patients. In kidney patients and their partners only communication changes to the better in the time course.
Conclusion: In any organ transplantation the two sides of the coin are important to bear in mind, the one is the live-saving act of transplantation as such, the other is the important distress in the phase before but equally after the operation, mainly in the first year where patients and their respective partners have to be followed and treated even in respect to psychosocial and marital functioning.
Similar articles
-
Patients benefit--partners suffer? The impact of heart transplantation on the partner relationship.Transpl Int. 1999;12(1):33-41. Transpl Int. 1999. PMID: 10080404
-
Quality of life in adult survivors beyond 10 years after liver, kidney, and heart transplantation.Transplantation. 2003 Dec 27;76(12):1699-704. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000092955.28529.1E. Transplantation. 2003. PMID: 14688519
-
Three-year survival rates for all consecutive heart-only and lung-only transplants performed in Eurotransplant, 1997-1999.Clin Transpl. 2003:89-100. Clin Transpl. 2003. PMID: 15387100
-
Quality of life after pediatric solid organ transplantation.Pediatr Clin North Am. 2010 Apr;57(2):559-74, table of contents. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2010.01.006. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2010. PMID: 20371052 Review.
-
MRI in organ transplantation.Radiol Clin North Am. 1987 Mar;25(2):281-8. Radiol Clin North Am. 1987. PMID: 3547475 Review.
Cited by
-
Dyadic Coping of Kidney Transplant Recipients and Their Partners: Sex and Role Differences.Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 26;10:397. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00397. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30863350 Free PMC article.
-
[Neurological aspects of chronic heart failure].Nervenarzt. 2011 Jun;82(6):733-42. doi: 10.1007/s00115-010-3093-6. Nervenarzt. 2011. PMID: 20694790 Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical