Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001;2(1):2-7.
doi: 10.1186/cvm-2-1-002.

Fundamental deficiencies in the megatrial methodology

Bruce G Charlton  1
Affiliations

Fundamental deficiencies in the megatrial methodology

Bruce G Charlton. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2001.

Abstract

The fundamental methodological deficiency of megatrials is deliberate reduction of experimental control in order to maximize recruitment and compliance of subjects. Hence, typical megatrials recruit pathologically and prognostically heterogeneous subjects, and protocols typically fail to exclude significant confounders. Therefore, most megatrials do not test a scientific hypothesis, nor are they informative about individual patients. The proper function of a megatrial is precise measurement of effect size for a therapeutic intervention. Valid megatrials can be designed only when simplification can be achieved without significantly affecting experimental control. Megatrials should be conducted only at the end of a long process of therapeutic development, and must always be designed and interpreted in the context of relevant scientific and clinical information.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Charlton BG. Clinical research methods for the new millennium. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999;5:251–263. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00182.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Healy D. The Antidepressant Era Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
    1. Charlton BG. Statistical malpractice. J Roy Coll Physicians London. 1996;30:112–114. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charlton BG. The new management of scientific knowledge: a change in direction with profound implications. In NICE, CHI and the NHS Reforms: Enabling Excellence or Imposing Control? Edited by Miles A, Hampton JR, Hurwitz B London: Aesculapius Medical Press, 2000. pp. 13–32.
    1. Charlton BG. Mega-trials: methodological issues and clinical implications. J Roy Coll Physicians London. 2000;29:96–100. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources