Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining
- PMID: 11806810
- PMCID: PMC64826
- DOI: 10.1186/cvm-2-6-263
Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining
Abstract
The treatment of patients with coronary artery disease continues to evolve; all three strategies - medical therapy, surgical revascularization, and percutaneous coronary intervention - have changed. Medical therapy with intense risk-factor modification and treatment with a statin, aspirin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, should be used unless contraindicated. Surgical therapy has also changed with the introduction of minimally invasive, beating heart surgery. Percutaneous coronary intervention has perhaps changed the most radically with adjunctive therapy - glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, thienopyridines, and reliance on stent implantation. The future, with new distal protection devices and drug-coated stents, should continue to see increased numbers of patients who can benefit from percutaneous intervention.
Similar articles
-
Balancing benefit against risk in the choice of therapy for coronary artery disease. Lesson from prospective, randomized, clinical trials of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Minerva Cardioangiol. 2003 Oct;51(5):585-97. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2003. PMID: 14551526 Review.
-
The complementary use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and drug-eluting stents in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention.J Invasive Cardiol. 2002 Dec;14 Suppl E:36E-46E; quiz 47E. J Invasive Cardiol. 2002. PMID: 12668861 Review.
-
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30025574
-
Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention: a new paradigm for a new century.Minerva Cardioangiol. 2005 Oct;53(5):361-77. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2005. PMID: 16179881 Review.
-
Diabetes and coronary revascularization.JAMA. 2005 Mar 23;293(12):1501-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.12.1501. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 15784875 Review.
Cited by
-
Recent evolution in demographic and clinical characteristics and in-hospital morbidity in patients undergoing coronary surgery.Can J Surg. 2009 Oct;52(5):394-400. Can J Surg. 2009. PMID: 19865574 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE, Jatene A, Bonnier H, Schönberger JPAM, Buller N, Bonser R, Marcel JB, van den Brand MCB, van Herwerden LA, Morel M-AM, van Hout BA, for the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study Group Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1117–1124. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200104123441502. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Stables RH. Stent or Surgery (SoS): Randomized trial tests bypass surgery against coronary stenting for multivessel disease. Presented at the American College of Cardiology 50th Annual Scientific Sessions. http://www.acc.org/media/session_info/late/ACC2001/index.htm March 18-21, 2001.
-
- Huey W. Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II) Trial: compares surgery, angioplasty, and drug therapy for mul-tivessel heart disease. Presented at the American College of Cardiology 50th Annual Scientific Sessions. http://www.acc.org/media/session_info/late/ACC2001/index.htm March 18-21, 2001.
-
- Henderson RA, Pocock SJ, Sharp SJ, Nanchahal K, Sculpher MJ, Buxton MJ, Hampton JR. Long-term results of RITA-1 trial: clinical and cost comparisons of coronary angioplasty and coronary-artery bypass grafting. Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina. Lancet. 1998;352:1419–1425. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)03358-3. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous