Intercepting a moving target: effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude
- PMID: 11807574
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-001-0920-9
Intercepting a moving target: effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude
Abstract
The effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude on performance of an interceptive aiming task were examined. Participants were required to strike a moving target object with a "bat" by moving the bat along a straight path (constrained by a linear slide) perpendicular to the path of the target. Temporal precision constraints were defined in terms of the time period (or window) within which contact with the target was possible. Three time windows were used (approx. 35, 50 and 65 ms) and these were achieved either by manipulating the size of the bat (experiment 1a), the size of the target (experiment 1b) or the speed of the target (experiment 2). In all experiments, movement time (MT) increased in proportion to movement amplitude but was only affected by differences in the temporal precision constraint if this was achieved by variation in the target's speed. In this case the MT was approximately inversely proportional to target speed. Peak movement speed was affected by temporal accuracy constraints in all three experiments: participants reached higher speeds when the temporal precision required was greater. These results are discussed with reference to the speed-accuracy trade-off observed for temporally constrained aiming movements. It is suggested that the MT and speed of interceptive aiming movements may be understood as responses to the spatiotemporal constraints of the task.
Similar articles
-
Systematic changes in the duration and precision of interception in response to variation of amplitude and effector size.Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jun;171(4):421-35. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0286-5. Epub 2005 Nov 24. Exp Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 16307234
-
Constraints on the spatiotemporal accuracy of interceptive action: effects of target size on hitting a moving target.Exp Brain Res. 2004 Apr;155(4):509-26. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1793-x. Epub 2004 Mar 4. Exp Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 14999437
-
Temporal precision of interceptive action: differential effects of target size and speed.Exp Brain Res. 2003 Feb;148(4):425-38. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1309-0. Epub 2002 Nov 22. Exp Brain Res. 2003. PMID: 12582826
-
Acting while perceiving: assimilation precedes contrast.Psychol Res. 2009 Jan;73(1):3-13. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0146-6. Epub 2008 Mar 26. Psychol Res. 2009. PMID: 18365250 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A theory of geometric constraints on neural activity for natural three-dimensional movement.J Neurosci. 1999 Apr 15;19(8):3122-45. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-08-03122.1999. J Neurosci. 1999. PMID: 10191327 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Catching a ball at the right time and place: individual factors matter.PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031770. Epub 2012 Feb 22. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22384072 Free PMC article.
-
Grasping in One-Handed Catching in Relation to Performance.PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158606. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27392041 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Systematic changes in the duration and precision of interception in response to variation of amplitude and effector size.Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jun;171(4):421-35. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0286-5. Epub 2005 Nov 24. Exp Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 16307234
-
Interception of real and apparent motion targets: psychophysics in humans and monkeys.Exp Brain Res. 2003 Sep;152(1):106-12. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1514-5. Epub 2003 Jul 18. Exp Brain Res. 2003. PMID: 12879173
-
Proprioception improves temporal accuracy in a coincidence-timing task.Exp Brain Res. 2011 Apr;210(2):251-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2627-x. Epub 2011 Mar 23. Exp Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 21431429
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources