A randomized monocentric trial in febrile neutropenic patients: ceftriaxone and gentamicin vs cefepime and gentamicin

Abstract

A prospective, randomized, controlled monocentric trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once daily ceftriaxone 2 g plus gentamicin 5 mg/kg in comparison to cefepime 2 g t.i.d. plus gentamicin 5 mg/kg q.d. in the treatment of neutropenic fever. In case of fever (oral temperature > or =38.5 degrees C on one occasion or > or =38.0 degrees C twice within 24 h) and a granulocytopenia (neutrophil count below 500 or below 1000/microl when expected to fall below 500 within 72 h), patients with hematological malignancies or solid tumors were assigned to ceftriaxone or cefepime, each with gentamicin. The primary endpoint was defined as defervescence on day 4-6 followed by at least 7 afebrile days. Secondary endpoints were overall response, defined as defervescence on day 28 and toxicity. Two hundred eleven episodes were included. Fever of unknown origin (FUO) accounted for 124 episodes (58.8%), microbiologically defined infection (MDI) for 39 (18.5%), clinically defined infection (CDI) for 25 (11.8%), and both clinically and microbiologically defined infection (CMDI) for 19 episodes (9%). On an intent-to-treat basis 207 episodes were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Ceftriaxone plus gentamicin and cefepime plus gentamicin were successful in 49.5% and 51%, respectively. Overall response was achieved on study day 28 in 92.5% and 91%, respectively. Diarrhea was more frequent with ceftriaxone/gentamicin (6.5% vs 17%), while nausea/vomiting was less (12.1% vs 5%). Once-daily ceftriaxone plus gentamicin was not inferior to cefepime t.i.d. plus gentamicin q.d. in the empirical treatment of neutropenic fever.