Process engineering variables in the spray washing of meat and produce
- PMID: 11808801
- DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-65.1.222
Process engineering variables in the spray washing of meat and produce
Abstract
Recently, much attention has been focused on the safety of fruits and vegetables. Washing is a fundamental operation in the processing of produce. Aqueous spray energy can be, and often is, used to remove mineral, chemical, or biological contaminants from produce. A few advantages of spray washing over washing by dipping, soaking, or gravity rinse are increased energy directed to contaminants, reduced volume of water use and wastewater generation, and reduced water uptake by produce. The kinetic energy of the spray droplets produces the cleaning action. Increased spray pressure increases energy. If the energy is too great, produce may be physically damaged. If the energy is too little, the surface may not be cleaned. Indeed, studies on meat have shown that water pressures ranging from 1,379 to 2,070 kPa (200 to 300 psi) are effective in reducing microbial contamination, and a water flow rate of 7.5 liters/min is recommended. Water temperature >70 degrees C has been found to reduce bacterial counts in carcass tissue by 2 to 3 log CFU/cm2. These levels are likely too high for the fragile produce; hence, the main function of spray washing in produce applications will probably shift to being a delivery system for antimicrobial agents. Several other equipment, process, and product variables are relevant to the optimization of such a system. Qualities of the spray, such as droplet spectrum, droplet velocity, angle of droplet impingement, number and orientation of nozzles, spray rate, and resident time of the produce in the sprayer, also can be manipulated to adjust the amount of energy directed to the surface. There is a need to scientifically investigate the effects of these processes and equipment parameters on the removal of microbiological contaminants on meats and produce. Such empirical investigations guided by the results from fundamental studies about produce surface characteristics and the mechanism of bacterial attachment to plant tissue surfaces would allow for the efficient development of spray washers that effectively decontaminate produce.
Similar articles
-
Investigation of water washes suitable for very small meat plants to reduce pathogens on beef surfaces.J Food Prot. 2010 May;73(5):907-15. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-73.5.907. J Food Prot. 2010. PMID: 20501042
-
Efficacy of home washing methods in controlling surface microbial contamination on fresh produce.J Food Prot. 2006 Feb;69(2):330-4. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-69.2.330. J Food Prot. 2006. PMID: 16496573
-
Microbial contamination of fruit and vegetables and their disinfection.Biol Pharm Bull. 2008 Oct;31(10):1902-5. doi: 10.1248/bpb.31.1902. Biol Pharm Bull. 2008. PMID: 18827352
-
Nonacid meat decontamination technologies: model studies and commercial applications.Int J Food Microbiol. 1998 Nov 10;44(3):171-88. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00136-6. Int J Food Microbiol. 1998. PMID: 9851598 Review.
-
Fresh-cut product sanitation and wash water disinfection: problems and solutions.Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Aug 31;134(1-2):37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.05.021. Epub 2009 May 25. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009. PMID: 19539390 Review.
Cited by
-
Sanitizer efficacy against murine norovirus, a surrogate for human norovirus, on stainless steel surfaces when using three application methods.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Feb;79(4):1368-77. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02843-12. Epub 2012 Dec 21. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013. PMID: 23263949 Free PMC article.
-
The Removal of Meat Exudate and Escherichia coli from Stainless Steel and Titanium Surfaces with Irregular and Regular Linear Topographies.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 19;18(6):3198. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063198. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33808807 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources