Perianal anatomy in non-abused preschool children
- PMID: 11808907
- DOI: 10.1080/080352501317130407
Perianal anatomy in non-abused preschool children
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe the normal variation in perianal anatomy in preschool children, selected for non-abuse, and to compare the findings in two examination positions. A letter of invitation was sent to 3773 children, after which 305 children (103 boys and 202 girls) were recruited. Inclusion in the study was based on self-selection, whereby parents who did not suspect any occurrence of sexual abuse of their child gave informed consent to participate. The mean age of the children was 5.63 y (range: 5.13-6.75). An anal examination was performed in the left lateral position (LLP) and the prone knee-chest position (KCP), for approximately 30 s each. A colposcope and a camera were used. All data were systematically analysed for gender differences, and a paired sample test was used to compare findings in LLP and KCP. Venous congestion in LLP and external anal dilatation in both positions were significantly more common in girls, while midline depressions and smooth areas (both positions) were significantly more common in boys. External and total anal dilatation, midline smooth areas and depressions and the occurrence of a prominent anal verge were significantly more common in the KCP. The finding of total anal dilatation was rare.
Conclusion: We observed several gender and position differences in perianal anatomy, and most of these findings seem to be related to structure and tone in the anal muscles.
Similar articles
-
Perianal findings in prepubertal children selected for nonabuse: a descriptive study.Child Abuse Negl. 1989;13(2):179-93. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(89)90005-7. Child Abuse Negl. 1989. PMID: 2743179
-
Genital anatomy in non-abused preschool girls.Acta Paediatr. 2003 Dec;92(12):1453-62. Acta Paediatr. 2003. PMID: 14971798
-
Anal findings in sexual abuse of children (a descriptive study).J Forensic Sci. 2003 Nov;48(6):1343-6. J Forensic Sci. 2003. PMID: 14640283
-
Genital findings in prepubertal girls: what can be concluded from an examination?J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2008 Aug;21(4):177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2007.08.005. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18656071 Review.
-
Interpretation of anogenital findings in the living child: Implications for the paediatric forensic autopsy.J Forensic Leg Med. 2007 Nov;14(8):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2007.03.005. Epub 2007 Jul 20. J Forensic Leg Med. 2007. PMID: 17961873 Review.
Cited by
-
Urogenital tract disorders in children suspected of being sexually abused.Cent European J Urol. 2016;69(1):112-7. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2016.673. Epub 2016 Mar 21. Cent European J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27123337 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Anal signs of child sexual abuse: a case-control study.BMC Pediatr. 2014 May 27;14:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-128. BMC Pediatr. 2014. PMID: 24884914 Free PMC article.
-
Physical evidence of child sexual abuse.Eur J Pediatr. 2012 May;171(5):751-5. doi: 10.1007/s00431-011-1556-9. Epub 2011 Nov 10. Eur J Pediatr. 2012. PMID: 22069148 Review.
-
Understanding Medical Findings in Child Sexual Abuse: An Update For 2018.Acad Forensic Pathol. 2018 Dec;8(4):924-937. doi: 10.1177/1925362118821491. Epub 2018 Dec 19. Acad Forensic Pathol. 2018. PMID: 31240081 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical