Uterine action after induction of labour with oral prostaglandin E2 tablets compared with intravenous oxytocin
- PMID: 1180955
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00705.x
Uterine action after induction of labour with oral prostaglandin E2 tablets compared with intravenous oxytocin
Abstract
Uterine action throughout the whole of labour induced by low amniotomy and either oral prostaglandin E2 tablets or intravenous ocytocin was studied in 10 randomly matched pairs of patients. Oral prostaglandin E2 tablets induced fewer contractions per hour, and these contractions were longer and more variable in length than those induced by intravenous oxytocin. There was no difference in basal uterine tone or in the amplitude of contractions. A comparison was made between the outcome of labour induced by low amniotomy and either oral prostaglandin E2 tablets 0-5 mg. hourly in 65 patients, or intravenous ocytocin in 41 patients. This dose of prostaglandin E2 tablets was an inadequate adjunct to low amniotomy in nulliparous patients. Despite this, the induction-delivery interval for the whole prostaglandin group was not significantly greater than that for the oxytocin group. There were no significant differences in fetal heart rate pattern, or in the incidence of gastro-intestinal side-effects between the two groups.
PIP: Uterine action throughout the whole of labor induced by low amniotomy and either oral PGE2 prostaglandin E2 tablets or intravenous oxytocin was studied in 10 randomly matched pairs of patients. Oral PGE2 tablets induced fewer contractions/hour, and these contractions were longer and more variable in length than those induced by intravenous oxytocin. There was no difference in basal uterine tone or in the amplitude of contractions. A comparison was made between the outcome of labor induced by low amniotomy and either oral PGE2 tablets 0.5 mg hourly in 65 patients, or intravenous oxytocin in 41 patients. This dose of PGE2 tablets was an inadequate adjunct to low amniotomy in nulliparous patients. Despite this, the induction-delivery interval for the whole PG group was not significantly greater than that for the oxytocin group. There were no significant differences in fetal heart rate pattern, or in the incidence of gastrointestinal side effects between the 2 groups.
Similar articles
-
Fixed dose prostaglandin E2 tablets in the induction of labour in multipara.Curr Med Res Opin. 1975;3(4):232-6. doi: 10.1185/03007997509113678. Curr Med Res Opin. 1975. PMID: 1080093
-
Effect of oxytocin and oral prostaglandin E2 on uterine contractility and fetal heart rate patterns.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Feb 15;130(4):403-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(78)90280-6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978. PMID: 629283
-
Comparison of intravenous oxytocin and prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour using automatic and non-automatic infusion techniques.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975 Sep;82(9):728-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00713.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975. PMID: 1101943 Clinical Trial.
-
[The importance of oxytocin and prostaglandins to the mechanism of labor in humans].Wien Klin Wochenschr Suppl. 1984;155:1-32. Wien Klin Wochenschr Suppl. 1984. PMID: 6099005 Review. German.
-
Characteristics of oral prostaglandin E2-induced labor.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Mar;26(1):87-94. doi: 10.1097/00003081-198303000-00012. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1983. PMID: 6340897 Review.