Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2001 Dec;72(6):557-71.
doi: 10.1080/000164701317268978.

Infection of orthopedic implants and the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cements. A review

Affiliations
Review

Infection of orthopedic implants and the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cements. A review

H van de Belt et al. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Dec.

Abstract

Infections by bacteria are a serious complication following orthopedic implant surgery, that can usually only be cured by removing the implant, since the biofilm mode of growth of infecting bacteria on an implant surface protects the organisms from the host immune system and antibiotic therapy. Over the past few decades, attempts have been made to prevent and cure orthopedic implant infections by incorporating antibiotics in polymethylmethacrylate bone cements, in primary and revision surgery. However, the clinical efficacy of antibiotic-releasing bone cements is not accepted by all and the long-term exposure to low doses from antibiotic-releasing bone cements in patients is strongly related to the emerging threat of antibiotic resistance in medicine today. In this article, we start by reviewing the mechanisms governing the formation of an infectious biofilm on orthopedic implant materials, the release mechanisms and properties of clinically-used, antibiotic-loaded bone cements. The clinical efficacy of antibiotic-loaded bone cements is evaluated analyzing separatedly the prophylactic and therapeutic uses of these products.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by