The potential cost-effectiveness of acellular pertussis booster vaccination in England and Wales
- PMID: 11818150
- DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(01)00473-x
The potential cost-effectiveness of acellular pertussis booster vaccination in England and Wales
Abstract
A cost-effectiveness analysis of the introduction of acellular pertussis booster doses at either 4 or 15 years of age was performed. A transmission dynamic model was used to predict the level of indirect protection in those too young to be vaccinated. Multivariate sensitivity analyses were performed. In England and Wales there are an estimated 35,000 general practitioner (GP) consultations, 5500 inpatient days, and nine deaths annually attributable to pertussis, despite high levels of coverage for the primary course (approximately 95%). Around 80% of the bed-days and 90% of the deaths occur in those too young to be immunised (< 3 months of age). The introduction of acellular booster doses at 4 years is expected to reduce morbidity and mortality in the younger age groups by 40-100%, and at 15 years by 0-100%. From the perspective of the health care provider, roughly 50% of the simulations result in a cost per life-year gained of less than 10,000 pounds for vaccination at 4 years, the corresponding proportion for vaccination at 15 years being only 35%. Apart from the degree of indirect protection the model was most sensitive to the discount rate, the price of the vaccine, and the mortality rate. Significant uncertainty remains regarding the epidemiology of pertussis and the impact of booster doses. Nevertheless, the introduction of acellular boosters, particularly at 4 years, has the potential to be cost-effective in the UK.
Similar articles
-
The distribution over time of costs and social net benefits for pertussis immunization programs.Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2010 Mar;10(1):1-27. doi: 10.1007/s10754-009-9058-2. Epub 2009 Mar 18. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2010. PMID: 19294502
-
The cost of epidemiological transition: a study of a decrease in pertussis vaccination coverage.Health Policy. 2005 Nov;74(3):287-303. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.01.015. Health Policy. 2005. PMID: 15951048
-
Cost-effectiveness of pertussis booster vaccination in the Netherlands.Vaccine. 2012 Nov 26;30(50):7327-31. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.026. Epub 2012 Jun 27. Vaccine. 2012. PMID: 22749838
-
A critical literature review of health economic evaluations in pertussis booster vaccination.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012 Feb;12(1):71-94. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.94. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012. PMID: 22280198 Review.
-
Recommendations to control pertussis prioritized relative to economies: A Global Pertussis Initiative update.Vaccine. 2018 Nov 19;36(48):7270-7275. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.028. Epub 2018 Oct 15. Vaccine. 2018. PMID: 30337176 Review.
Cited by
-
Economic evaluation of adolescents and adults' pertussis vaccination: A systematic review of current strategies.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(1):14-27. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1509646. Epub 2018 Sep 11. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019. PMID: 30118618 Free PMC article.
-
Which strategy for pertussis vaccination today?Paediatr Drugs. 2002;4(5):299-313. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200204050-00003. Paediatr Drugs. 2002. PMID: 11994035 Review.
-
Acellular pertussis vaccine efficacy: An updated systematic review and meta -analysis.Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 Nov 29;30:451. eCollection 2016. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016. PMID: 28491826 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the etiological spectrum of respiratory infections in children.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1007/s10096-025-05222-5. Online ahead of print. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025. PMID: 40742643
-
The distribution over time of costs and social net benefits for pertussis immunization programs.Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2010 Mar;10(1):1-27. doi: 10.1007/s10754-009-9058-2. Epub 2009 Mar 18. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2010. PMID: 19294502
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources