Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Feb;92(2):294-7.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.2.294.

The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes

Jessica Clark Newman  1 , Don C Des Jarlais, Charles F Turner, Jay Gribble, Phillip Cooley, Denise Paone
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes

Jessica Clark Newman et al. Am J Public Health. 2002 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: This study assessed the differential effects of face-to-face interviewing and audio-computer assisted self-interviewing (audio-CASI) on categories of questions.

Methods: Syringe exchange program participants (n = 1417) completed face-to-face interviews or audio-CASI. The questionnaire was categorized into the groups "stigmatized behaviors," "neutral behaviors," and "psychological distress." Interview modes were compared for questions from each category.

Results: Audio-CASI elicited more frequent reporting of "stigmatized behaviors" than face-to-face interviews. Face-to-face interviewing elicited more frequent reporting of "psychological distress" than audio-CASI.

Conclusions: Responding to potentially sensitive questions should not be seen as merely "providing data," but rather as an activity with complex motivations. These motivations can include maintaining social respect, obtaining social support, and altruism. Ideally, procedures for collecting self-report data would maximize altruistic motivation while accommodating the other motives.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Groves RM, Cialdini RB, Couper MP. Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public Opinion Q. 1992;56:475–495.
    1. Catania JA. A framework for conceptualizing reporting bias and its antecedents in interviews assessing human sexuality. J Sex Res. 1999;36:25–38.
    1. Catania JA, Gibson DR, Chitwood DD, Coates TJ. Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychol Bull. 1990;108:339–362. - PubMed
    1. Aquilino WS. Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use. Public Opinion Q. 1994;58:210–240.
    1. Turner CF, Lessler JT, George B, Hubbard M, Witt M. Effects of mode of administration and wording on data quality. In: Turner CF, Lessler JT, Gfroerer JC, eds. Survey Measurement of Drug Abuse: Methodological Studies. Rockville, Md: National Institutes of Health; 1992:221–244. DHHS publication ADM 92–1929.

Publication types