[Ultrasonic instrumentation versus hand instrumentation in periodontics. A review of the literature]
- PMID: 11819997
[Ultrasonic instrumentation versus hand instrumentation in periodontics. A review of the literature]
Abstract
The working mechanism and the correct use of ultrasonic devices is discussed. Comparative efficiency of ultrasonic and hand instrumentation is evaluated for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus, for the effect on root surfaces and for the ability in removing endotoxins. Possible side effects of the ultrasonic vibrations on the tooth structures and periodontal tissues, the incidence of bacteremias and the spreading of oral infections via aerosols are stated. Particular attention is given to the clinical results of both instrumentation technics and the necessity of root planing. One can conclude, that ultrasonics present an alternative and/or a supply for hand instruments, provided that a selective and careful use is taken into account.
Similar articles
-
Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?Dent Clin North Am. 1998 Apr;42(2):229-44. Dent Clin North Am. 1998. PMID: 9597335 Review.
-
A clinical evaluation of hand and ultrasonic instruments on subgingival debridement. 1. With unmodified and modified ultrasonic inserts.Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;12(4):310-23. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992. PMID: 1428611 Clinical Trial.
-
Scaling and root planing without overinstrumentation: hand versus power-driven scalers.Curr Opin Periodontol. 1993:78-88. Curr Opin Periodontol. 1993. PMID: 8401851 Review.
-
Periodontal instrumentation.Dent Today. 1995 Apr;14(4):86, 88-91. Dent Today. 1995. PMID: 9540680 No abstract available.
-
Clinical evaluation of the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal on single-rooted teeth with diamond-coated ultrasonic tips.J Periodontol. 1997 May;68(5):436-42. doi: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.5.436. J Periodontol. 1997. PMID: 9182738 Clinical Trial.