Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001;90(4):252-5.

Role of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound in staging of pancreatic tumours

Affiliations
  • PMID: 11820412

Role of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound in staging of pancreatic tumours

M I Lavonius et al. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 2001.

Abstract

Background and aims: Radiological imaging alone is not reliable enough in staging of pancreatic cancer. Not only because of poor sensitivity but also because there is a tendency to overstage tumours. The aim of the study was to compare the efficiency of spiral computed tomography (CT), transabdominal ultrasound (US), laparoscopy (LAP) and laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) in staging of pancreatic tumours.

Material and methods: In this prospective study 27 patients underwent pancreatic tumour staging with CT, US, LAP and LUS. The reference standard was operative evaluation or in case of disseminated disease laparoscopic assessment.

Results and conclusions: Although LAP was hindered by adhesions in 11% of the patients the benefit of LAP staging was evident in detecting peritoneal carcinomatosis. The assessment of the local tumour expansion of a pancreatic carcinoma was difficult for all staging modalities. LUS did not change the decision whether to proceed with laparotomy once. In our experience routine use of laparoscopic staging does not benefit patients with pancreatic tumour but in selected cases it may prevent unnecessary laparotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources