Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer
- PMID: 11821454
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.727
Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer
Abstract
Purpose: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-control study was designed to determine whether a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim (SD/01, sustained-duration filgrastim; 100 microg/kg) is as safe and effective as daily filgrastim (5 microg/kg/d) for reducing neutropenia in patients who received four cycles of myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
Patients and methods: Sixty-two centers enrolled 310 patients who received chemotherapy with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 of each cycle for a maximum of four cycles. Patients were randomized to receive on day 2 either a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim 100 microg/kg per chemotherapy cycle (154 patients) or daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim 5 microg/kg/d (156 patients). Absolute neutrophil count (ANC), duration of grade 4 neutropenia, and safety parameters were monitored.
Results: One dose of pegfilgrastim per chemotherapy cycle was comparable to daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim with regard to all efficacy end points, including the duration of severe neutropenia and the depth of ANC nadir in all cycles. Febrile neutropenia across all cycles occurred less often in patients who received pegfilgrastim. The difference in the mean duration of severe neutropenia between the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim treatment groups was less than 1 day. Pegfilgrastim was safe and well tolerated, and it was similar to filgrastim. Adverse event profiles in the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups were similar.
Conclusion: A single injection of pegfilgrastim 100 microg/kg per cycle was as safe and effective as daily injections of filgrastim 5 microg/kg/d in reducing neutropenia and its complications in patients who received four cycles of doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2).
Similar articles
-
A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.Ann Oncol. 2003 Jan;14(1):29-35. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg019. Ann Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12488289 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer.Ann Oncol. 2002 Jun;13(6):903-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf130. Ann Oncol. 2002. PMID: 12123336 Clinical Trial.
-
Bone pain associated with once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim is similar to daily filgrastim in patients with breast cancer.Clin Breast Cancer. 2003 Feb;3(6):391-8. doi: 10.3816/cbc.2003.n.003. Clin Breast Cancer. 2003. PMID: 12636878
-
Pegfilgrastim: using pegylation technology to improve neutropenia support in cancer patients.Anticancer Drugs. 2003 Apr;14(4):259-64. doi: 10.1097/00001813-200304000-00002. Anticancer Drugs. 2003. PMID: 12679729 Review.
-
Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.Pharmacotherapy. 2003 Aug;23(8 Pt 2):15S-19S. doi: 10.1592/phco.23.9.15s.32889. Pharmacotherapy. 2003. PMID: 12921218 Review.
Cited by
-
Chemotherapy-associated treatment burden in breast cancer patients receiving lipegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim: secondary efficacy data from a phase III study.Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jan;24(1):395-400. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2803-9. Epub 2015 Jun 20. Support Care Cancer. 2016. PMID: 26092233 Clinical Trial.
-
Open-labeled, multicenter phase II study of prophylactic administration of pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who received pomalidomide-based regimens (KMM170).Front Oncol. 2023 Oct 25;13:1209110. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1209110. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37965454 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical confirmation to demonstrate similarity for a biosimilar pegfilgrastim: a 3-way randomized equivalence study for a proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim versus US-licensed and EU-approved reference products in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.Exp Hematol Oncol. 2018 Sep 6;7:22. doi: 10.1186/s40164-018-0114-9. eCollection 2018. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30202638 Free PMC article.
-
Extrapolation in Practice: Lessons from 10 Years with Biosimilar Filgrastim.BioDrugs. 2019 Dec;33(6):635-645. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00373-2. BioDrugs. 2019. PMID: 31440986 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predictive Parameters of Febrile Neutropenia and Clinical Significance of G-CSF Receptor Signaling Pathway in the Development of Neutropenia during R-CHOP Chemotherapy with Prophylactic Pegfilgrastim in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Oct;54(4):1256-1267. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.944. Epub 2021 Dec 31. Cancer Res Treat. 2022. PMID: 34990523 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical