Minilaparoscopic appendectomy
- PMID: 11822857
- DOI: 10.1097/00129689-200112000-00002
Minilaparoscopic appendectomy
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using 2-mm laparoscopic instruments in the treatment of appendicitis and to identify risk factors that may limit their use. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was performed through a 2-mm port in the umbilicus for a videoendoscope, a 2-mm working port in the right upper quadrant, and a 5/12-mm suprapubic port for an endoscopic stapler. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was attempted in 26 consecutive patients with appendicitis. Thirty-two consecutive patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic appendectomy with 5- and 10-mm instruments and videoendoscopes before the availability of 2-mm instrumentation were analyzed for comparison. Statistical comparisons were made by the Student t test and Fisher exact test. Differences were considered statistically significant at a P value less than 0.05. There were no conversions to an open appendectomy in the minilaparoscopic appendectomy or conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group. The mean operative time was 69.5 minutes for the minilaparoscopic appendectomy group and 85.5 minutes for the conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group (P = 0.02). The mean postoperative length of stay was 1.7 days for the minilaparoscopic appendectomy group and 2.5 days for the conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group (P = 0.08). There was no significant difference in the complication rates (P = 0.31). Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was completed in 13 (50.0%) patients. Independent risk factors (P = 0.05) for conversion to 5- or 10-mm ports were a retrocecal appendix and increasing patient age. There were no differences in the mean postoperative length of stay (P = 0.12) or complication rate (P = 0.39) between the two groups, but mean operative time was longer (P = 0.05) in the converted group. Perioperative outcomes for minilaparoscopic appendectomy are comparable to those of conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. The use of 2-mm instrumentation in the management of appendicitis is limited in patients with retrocecal appendicitis. Increasing patient age and a history of abdominal surgery may influence the need to convert 2-mm ports to 5- or 10-mm ports.
Comment in
-
Needlescopic appendectomy as a routine procedure: "Just because you can?" or "Just because you cannot?".Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002 Aug;12(4):301-2; author reply 302-4. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200208000-00022. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002. PMID: 12193832 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy using conventional instruments: the single working channel technique.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Apr;23(2):208-11. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182827f5d. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013. PMID: 23579520 Clinical Trial.
-
Minilaparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.JSLS. 2006 Jan-Mar;10(1):52-5. JSLS. 2006. PMID: 16709358 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in adults and adolescents using an endolinear stapler.Osaka City Med J. 2014 Jun;60(1):21-7. Osaka City Med J. 2014. PMID: 25272564
-
Appendicitis: laparoscopic versus conventional operation: a study and review of the literature.Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997 Dec;7(6):459-63. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997. PMID: 9438626 Review.
-
Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors.Surg Endosc. 2004 Jun;18(6):969-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8262-2. Epub 2004 Apr 21. Surg Endosc. 2004. PMID: 15095081 Review.
Cited by
-
A SAGES technology and value assessment and pediatric committee evaluation of mini-laparoscopic instrumentation.Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7077-7091. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09467-5. Epub 2022 Aug 19. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 35986221
-
Mini-laparoscopic appendectomy using a needle loop retractor offers optimal cosmetic results.Surg Endosc. 2004 Nov;18(11):1578-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8248-0. Epub 2004 Sep 23. Surg Endosc. 2004. PMID: 15580448 Clinical Trial.
-
Acute appendicitis: what is the gold standard of treatment?World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 21;19(47):8799-807. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.8799. World J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 24379603 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Needlescopic versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review.Can J Surg. 2009 Apr;52(2):129-34. Can J Surg. 2009. PMID: 19399208 Free PMC article.
-
Two-port vs. three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: A bridge to least invasive surgery.J Minim Access Surg. 2012 Oct;8(4):140-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.103121. J Minim Access Surg. 2012. PMID: 23248441 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical