Identifying domestic violence: cross sectional study in primary care
- PMID: 11823360
- PMCID: PMC65060
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7332.274
Identifying domestic violence: cross sectional study in primary care
Abstract
Objectives: To measure the prevalence of domestic violence among women attending general practice; test the association between experience of domestic violence and demographic factors; evaluate the extent of recording of domestic violence in records held by general practices; and assess acceptability to women of screening for domestic violence by general practitioners or practice nurses.
Design: Self administered questionnaire survey. Review of medical records.
Setting: General practices in Hackney, London.
Participants: 1207 women (>15 years) attending selected practices.
Main outcome measures: Prevalence of domestic violence against women. Association between demographic factors and domestic violence reported in questionnaire. Comparison of recording of domestic violence in medical records with that reported in questionnaire. Attitudes of women towards being questioned about domestic violence by general practitioners or practice nurses.
Results: 425/1035 women (41%, 95% confidence interval 38% to 44%) had ever experienced physical violence from a partner or former partner and 160/949 (17%, 14% to 19%) had experienced it within the past year. Pregnancy in the past year was associated with an increased risk of current violence (adjusted odds ratio 2.11, 1.39 to 3.19). Physical violence was recorded in the medical records of 15/90 (17%) women who reported it on the questionnaire. At least 202/1010 (20%) women objected to screening for domestic violence.
Conclusions: With the high prevalence of domestic violence, health professionals should maintain a high level of awareness of the possibility of domestic violence, especially affecting pregnant women, but the case for screening is not yet convincing.
Comment in
-
Preventing domestic violence.BMJ. 2002 Feb 2;324(7332):253-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7332.253. BMJ. 2002. PMID: 11823345 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Domestic violence. Literature is biased as studies rarely look at female-to-male violence.BMJ. 2002 Jul 6;325(7354):44. BMJ. 2002. PMID: 12102077 No abstract available.
-
Domestic violence. European sentinel network of practices has been established.BMJ. 2002 Jul 6;325(7354):44. BMJ. 2002. PMID: 12102078 No abstract available.
-
Domestic violence. Screening can be made acceptable to women.BMJ. 2002 Jul 6;325(7354):44. BMJ. 2002. PMID: 12102079 No abstract available.
References
-
- Coid J, Petruckevitch A, Feder G, Chung W-S, Richardson J, Moorey S. Relation between childhood sexual and physical abuse and risk of revictimisation in women: a cross sectional survey. Lancet. 2001;358:450–454. - PubMed
-
- Domestic violence: a resource manual for health care professionals. London: Department of Health; 2000.
-
- American Medical Association diagnostic and treatment guidelines on domestic violence. Arch Fam Med. 1992;1:39–47. - PubMed
-
- Cole TB. Is domestic violence screening helpful? JAMA. 2000;284:551–553. - PubMed
-
- Department of Health, UK National Screening Committee. The criteria for appraising the viability, effectiveness and appropriateness of a screening programme. www.doh.gov.uk/nsc/pdfs/criteria.pdf (accessed 2 Nov 2001).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous