Bone healing and bone substitutes
- PMID: 11823929
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-19823
Bone healing and bone substitutes
Abstract
With the advent of new biomaterials and surgical techniques, the reconstructive surgeon has a wider range of treatment modalities for the rehabilitation and reconstruction of craniofacial skeletal deformities than ever before. These innovative substances act as true bone graft substitutes, thereby allowing the surgeon to avoid the use of autogenous bone grafts and their associated donor site morbidity. Surgeons have long been interested in producing a composite graft that can heal faster by induction, incorporate with surrounding tissues, and be remodeled to resemble native bone. Currently, there are a host of bone graft substitutes available that vary in both their composition and properties. Craniomaxillofacial surgeons must therefore become comfortable with numerous biomaterials to best tailor the treatment for each patient individually. Ongoing investigations into the next phase of tissue engineering will continue to bring us closer to the ability to regenerate or replace bone.
Similar articles
-
Update on new biomaterials and their use in reconstructive surgery.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Aug;11(4):240-4. doi: 10.1097/00020840-200308000-00004. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003. PMID: 14515070 Review.
-
Biomaterials in the Reconstruction of the Oral and Maxillofacial Region.Front Oral Biol. 2015;17:101-14. doi: 10.1159/000381700. Epub 2015 Jul 20. Front Oral Biol. 2015. PMID: 26201280
-
Current use of bone substitutes in maxillofacial surgery.Facial Plast Surg. 1999;15(1):73-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1064302. Facial Plast Surg. 1999. PMID: 11816100 Review.
-
Biomaterials in craniofacial reconstruction.Clin Plast Surg. 2004 Jul;31(3):377-85, v. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2004.03.001. Clin Plast Surg. 2004. PMID: 15219744 Review.
-
Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon.J Craniofac Surg. 2005 Nov;16(6):981-9. doi: 10.1097/01.scs.0000179662.38172.dd. J Craniofac Surg. 2005. PMID: 16327544 Review.
Cited by
-
Bone grafts in craniofacial surgery.Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2009 Oct;2(3):125-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215875. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2009. PMID: 22110806 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro osteogenesis on fluorcanasite glass-ceramic with three different chemical compositions.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008 Feb;19(2):833-8. doi: 10.1007/s10856-007-3081-y. Epub 2007 Aug 1. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008. PMID: 17665118
-
Involvement of calvarial stem cells in healing: A regional analysis of large cranial defects.Wound Repair Regen. 2018 Sep;26(5):359-365. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12658. Epub 2018 Nov 8. Wound Repair Regen. 2018. PMID: 30054956 Free PMC article.
-
A Novel Triad of Bio-Inspired Design, Digital Fabrication, and Bio-Derived Materials for Personalised Bone Repair.Materials (Basel). 2024 Oct 31;17(21):5305. doi: 10.3390/ma17215305. Materials (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39517582 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Collagen-hydroxyapatite composite enhances regeneration of calvaria bone defects in young rats but postpones the regeneration of calvaria bone in aged rats.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008 May;19(5):2015-21. doi: 10.1007/s10856-007-3284-2. Epub 2007 Oct 19. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008. PMID: 17952564
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical