Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Mar;38(3):189-91.

[Lung cancer: new staging system and prognosis]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 11832024

[Lung cancer: new staging system and prognosis]

[Article in Chinese]
C Li et al. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2000 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the rationality the revised international system for staging lung cancer and its relationship with prognosis.

Methods: Between January 1961 and December 1988, 946 patients were subjected to removal of lung cancer and the data were analyzed using life-table, Log-rank test, and Cox regression model. Twenty-nine prognostic factors influencing the survival rate were evaluated with SAS6.12 software. The survival rate was calculated according to the two different staging systems. The revised system for staging lung cancer was evaluated.

Results: The factors influencing prognosis after surgical treatment of lung cancer were as follows: P-TNM staging, metastatic lymph nodes, radical or palliative resection, tumor size, and different cell types. The 5-year survival rate of patients with stage IA, IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB was 68.4%, 59.5%, 44.8%, 36.5%, 26.3%, and staging 24.8%, respectively (IIIA and IIIB P > 0.05; other stages P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The revised system for lung cancer is more rational and objective to estimate prognosis and direct treatment. But it should be revised further.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Publication types