Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Oct;89(4):346-52.

Evidence-based practice: extending the search to find material for the systematic review

D Helmer  1 , I Savoie, C Green, A Kazanjian
Affiliations

Evidence-based practice: extending the search to find material for the systematic review

D Helmer et al. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2001 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Cochrane-style systematic reviews increasingly require the participation of librarians. Guidelines on the appropriate search strategy to use for systematic reviews have been proposed. However, research evidence supporting these recommendations is limited.

Objective: This study investigates the effectiveness of various systematic search methods used to uncover randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for systematic reviews. Effectiveness is defined as the proportion of relevant material uncovered for the systematic review using extended systematic review search methods. The following extended systematic search methods are evaluated: searching subject-specific or specialized databases (including trial registries), hand searching, scanning reference lists, and communicating personally.

Methods: Two systematic review projects were prospectively monitored regarding the method used to identify items as well as the type of items retrieved. The proportion of RCTs identified by each systematic search method was calculated.

Results: The extended systematic search methods uncovered 29.2% of all items retrieved for the systematic reviews. The search of specialized databases was the most effective method, followed by scanning of reference lists, communicating personally, and hand searching. Although the number of items identified through hand searching was small, these unique items would otherwise have been missed.

Conclusions: Extended systematic search methods are effective tools for uncovering material for the systematic review. The quality of the items uncovered has yet to be assessed and will be key in evaluating the value of the systematic search methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JA, Haynes RB, and Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996 Jan 13; 312(7023):71–2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davidoff F, Haynes B, Sackett D, and Smith R. Evidence based medicine. BMJ. 1995 Apr 29; 310(6987):1085–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berry E, Kelly S, Hutton J, Harris KM, and Smith MA. Identifying studies for systematic reviews. an example from medical imaging. Int J Technol Assess. 2000 Spring; 16(2):668–72. - PubMed
    1. Dickersin K, Scherre R, and Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994 Nov 12; 309(6964):1286–91. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mulrow CD, Oxman AD. eds. Cochrane Collaboration handbook. In: The Cochrane Library. Issue 4. [database on disk and CDROM]. Oxford, U.K.: Update Software, 1997.

LinkOut - more resources