Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Oct;89(4):372-8.

Online journals: impact on print journal usage

S L De Groote  1 , J L Dorsch
Affiliations

Online journals: impact on print journal usage

S L De Groote et al. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2001 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: The research sought to determine the impact of online journals on the use of print journals and interlibrary loan (ILL).

Setting: The Library of the Health Sciences-Peoria is a regional site of the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) Library with a print journal collection of approximately 400 titles. Since 1999, UIC site licenses have given students and faculty affiliated with UIC-Peoria access to more than 4,000 online full-text journal titles through the Internet.

Methodology: The Library of the Health Sciences-Peoria has conducted a journal-use study over an extended period of time. The information collected from this study was used to assess the impact of 104 online journals, added to the collection in January 1999, on the use of print journals.

Results: Results of the statistical analysis showed print journal usage decreased significantly since the introduction of online journals (F(1,147) = 12.10, P < 0.001). This decrease occurred regardless of whether a journal was available only in print or both online and in print. Interlibrary loan requests have also significantly decreased since the introduction of online journals (F(2,30) = 4.46, P < 0.02).

Conclusions: The decrease in use of the print collection suggests that many patrons prefer to access journals online. The negative impact the online journals have had on the use of the journal titles available only in print suggests users may be compromising quality for convenience when selecting journal articles. Possible implications for collection development are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean journal usage of 1995 to 1999 print journals
Figure 2
Figure 2
Journal use of 1995 to 1999 journals by print status
Figure 3
Figure 3
Use of 1995 to 1999 print journals by print status and Abridged Index Medicus (AIM) status
Figure 4
Figure 4
Journal use of pre-1950 to 1995 journals by print status
Figure 5
Figure 5
Interlibrary loan requests (January to November)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Millson-Martula C. Use studies and serials rationalization: a review. Serials Libr. 1988 15(1–2): 121–36.
    1. Milne D, Tiffany B. A cost-per-use method for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of serials: a detailed discussion of methodology. Serials Rev. 1991 Summer; 17(2):7–19.
    1. Blecic DD. Measurements of journal use: an analysis of the correlation between three methods. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1999 Jan; 87(1):20–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Young IR. The use of a general periodicals bibliographic database transaction log as a serials collection management tool. Serials Rev. 1992 Winter; 18(4):49–60.
    1. Milton S. Has the availability of electronic journals in full text affected interlibrary loan usage? ALKI. 1998 Mar; 14(1):18–9.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources