The effect of technical support on clinician attitudes toward an outcome assessment instrument
- PMID: 11840909
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02287837
The effect of technical support on clinician attitudes toward an outcome assessment instrument
Abstract
This study evaluated the impact of technical support on mental health clinicians' attitudes and use of an outcome assessment (OA) instrument. Technical support involved providing clinicians with the scored and profiled results of an OA instrument administered to their patients. It was predicted that temporary exposure to the instrument's uses would improve clinicians' attitudes toward the instrument and that improved attitudes would lead to greater use. The results indicated that subsequent to support clinicians' attitudes toward the instrument were generally more positive, as they had generally more favorable opinions, saw it as more relevant, and reported that it was relatively easy to use. Contrary to expectations, however, clinicians did not use the OA instrument more frequently or regularly after support. The implications for clinics seeking to implement OA protocols are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Pragmatics of tracking mental health outcomes in a managed care setting.J Ment Health Adm. 1995 Summer;22(3):226-36. doi: 10.1007/BF02521118. J Ment Health Adm. 1995. PMID: 10144458
-
Attitudes toward standardized assessment tools and their use among clinicians in a public mental health service.Nord J Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;73(7):387-396. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1642383. Epub 2019 Jul 19. Nord J Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 31322010
-
The Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-R): reliability and validity.Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1230-41. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200412000-00010. Med Care. 2004. PMID: 15550803
-
General Medical Clinicians' Attitudes Toward People with Serious Mental Illness: A Scoping Review.J Behav Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;46(4):656-679. doi: 10.1007/s11414-019-09652-w. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 30887413 Free PMC article.
-
Issues and approaches in evaluating managed mental health care.Milbank Q. 1995;73(1):57-75. Milbank Q. 1995. PMID: 7898408 Review.
Cited by
-
Implementation of routine outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services in the United Kingdom: a critical perspective.Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;23(4):239-42. doi: 10.1007/s00787-013-0454-2. Epub 2013 Jul 30. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014. PMID: 23896764 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The use of routine outcome measures in two child and adolescent mental health services: a completed audit cycle.BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Oct 20;13:270. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-270. BMC Psychiatry. 2013. PMID: 24139139 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of the Current Assessment Practice Evaluation-Revised (CAPER) in a National Sample.J Behav Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan;46(1):43-63. doi: 10.1007/s11414-018-9621-z. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 29752631
-
Field test of the feasibility and validity of using the Hoosier Assurance Plan Instrument for Adults in a state mental health program.Community Ment Health J. 2009 Aug;45(4):316-22. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9214-7. Epub 2009 Jun 24. Community Ment Health J. 2009. PMID: 19551504
-
Clinician use of standardized assessments following a common elements psychotherapy training and consultation program.Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Jan;42(1):47-60. doi: 10.1007/s10488-014-0543-7. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015. PMID: 24590606 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical