Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Jan-Feb;14(1):15-21.

EMG and pain severity evaluation in patients with TMD using two different occlusal devices

Affiliations
  • PMID: 11842899
Clinical Trial

EMG and pain severity evaluation in patients with TMD using two different occlusal devices

M Al-Saad et al. Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the electromyographic (EMG) activity level and signs and symptoms in patients with myogenous temporomandibular disorders (TMD) treated with two different types of occlusal devices.

Materials and methods: Eleven TMD patients were treated with maxillary occlusal devices. The first group received a flat-plane stabilization occlusal device, while the second group received an anatomic occlusal device that maintained the anatomy of the original occlusal surfaces. The severity of signs and symptoms and the masseter EMG activity were recorded and evaluated before treatment and at 72 hours, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks following the delivery of the occlusal device. EMG activity was measured during maximum clenching and during chewing on the right and left sides. The EMG was also recorded for seven normal subjects as a control group.

Results: All patients showed reduction of reported and clinically found muscle pain, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups. A reduction in the EMG activity level at maximum clenching was seen in both patient groups, but was significant only with the anatomic occlusal device. Mean EMG activity during chewing was highly variable within and between groups.

Conclusion: The subjective and objective improvements with both types of occlusal devices suggest that either type of occlusal device can be beneficial to TMD patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources