Short-term clinical evaluation of inlay and onlay restorations made with a ceromer
- PMID: 11842911
Short-term clinical evaluation of inlay and onlay restorations made with a ceromer
Abstract
Purpose: This prospective clinical trial evaluated the clinical acceptability of a new material, ceromer, used for inlay and onlay restorations in single- or multisurface cavities of posterior teeth.
Materials and methods: Forty-three Targis inlay and onlay restorations were placed in 25 patients and evaluated using the United States Public Health Service criteria. The laboratory work was conducted by three dental technicians according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Twenty-five restorations were luted with Syntac bonding system and Variolink II, and 18 were luted with Scotchbond Multi Purpose and Opal Luting Composite. The recalls were done at 6, 12, and 18 months. Restorations were evaluated for six parameters and scored as ideal (A), clinically acceptable (B), or clinically unacceptable (C).
Results: Indirect restorations received, after 18 months, scores of A at the following rates: color match 77%; marginal discoloration 93%; secondary caries 100%; anatomic form 93%; and marginal integrity 95%. For these parameters, statistical analysis indicated no significant differences at baseline and after 18 months. Postoperative hypersensitivity was reported by seven patients at baseline, but it decreased and there was no hypersensitivity at 12- and 18-month follow-ups.
Conclusion: Over an 18-month period the Targis restorative system yielded good clinical service.
Similar articles
-
Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010 May 1;11(3):025-32. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010. PMID: 20461321
-
A prospective clinical study of ceromer inlays: results up to 53 months.Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Jan-Feb;17(1):17-23. Int J Prosthodont. 2004. PMID: 15008227 Clinical Trial.
-
Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.Quintessence Int. 2002 Jul-Aug;33(7):542-8. Quintessence Int. 2002. PMID: 12165991 Clinical Trial.
-
Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.Am J Dent. 2000 Nov;13(Spec No):60D-76D. Am J Dent. 2000. PMID: 11763920 Review.
-
Clinical considerations for aesthetic laboratory-fabricated inlay/onlay restorations: a review.Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb;13(1):51-8; quiz 60. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2001. PMID: 11301531 Review.
Cited by
-
Mechanical and Tribological Characterization of a Dental Ceromer.J Funct Biomater. 2020 Feb 21;11(1):11. doi: 10.3390/jfb11010011. J Funct Biomater. 2020. PMID: 32098165 Free PMC article.