Evaluation of left ventricular function and mass after Medtronic Freestyle versus homograft aortic root replacement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance
- PMID: 11843507
Evaluation of left ventricular function and mass after Medtronic Freestyle versus homograft aortic root replacement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Abstract
Background and aim of the study: Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) after aortic valve replacement has traditionally been measured by echocardiography. However, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can be used to measure left ventricular function and mass more accurately and reproducibly. This translates into fewer patients being needed to demonstrate significant changes. The study aim was to demonstrate the feasibility of using CMR to measure left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and function in patients from a prospective randomized trial, and to compare homografts with the Medtronic Freestyle root replacement.
Methods: Among 23 patients recruited, 17 had LVMI and function (end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV) and ejection fraction (EF)) measured pre- and postoperatively using CMR (eight homograft, nine Freestyle).
Results: Significant regression of LVH was seen in both groups one year postoperatively (homograft LVMI 145+/-44 g/m2 preoperative versus 83+/-23 g/m2 one year postoperatively; Freestyle LVMI 140+/-28 g/m2 versus 93+/-21 g/m2, respectively). At six months there was significant regression in the xenograft group (from 140+/-28 to 106+/-22 g/m2; p <0.05) and a trend towards regression in the homograft group (from 145+/-44 to 103+/-25 g/m2; p = NS). There was also a trend towards a reduction in EDV, ESV and SV, and an increase in EF over one year in both groups.
Conclusion: Regression of LVH was measured using CMR in patients after aortic root replacement and coronary implantation with the homograft and Medtronic Freestyle root replacement. Despite the small number of patients studied, it was possible to demonstrate the extent and pattern of regression of left ventricular mass in the two groups.
Similar articles
-
Aortic distensibility after aortic root replacement assessed with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 Jan;11(1):67-74; discussion 74. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002. PMID: 11843508 Clinical Trial.
-
Changes in left ventricular function and mass during serial investigations after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.J Heart Valve Dis. 2000 Jul;9(4):583-93. J Heart Valve Dis. 2000. PMID: 10947054
-
Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement in patients over 55 years old with different valve types.Med Sci Monit. 2003 Feb;9(2):CR55-60. Med Sci Monit. 2003. PMID: 12601287
-
Late outcomes following freestyle versus homograft aortic root replacement: results from a prospective randomized trial.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jan 26;55(4):368-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.030. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20117443 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of left ventricular hypertrophy by magnetic resonance imaging.Am J Card Imaging. 1994 Oct;8(4):310-5. Am J Card Imaging. 1994. PMID: 7819725 Review.
Cited by
-
MRI in patients with cardiac devices.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2007 Mar;9(1):63-71. doi: 10.1007/s11886-007-0012-y. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2007. PMID: 17362687 Review.
-
A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor Ramipril In Aortic Stenosis (RIAS trial).Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Aug;16(8):834-41. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev043. Epub 2015 Mar 21. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25796267 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Durability of bioprosthetic cardiac valves.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008 Feb;105(8):143-8. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0143. Epub 2008 Feb 22. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008. PMID: 19633780 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous