Reasons for variation in coverage in the NHS cervical screening programme
- PMID: 11843937
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2001.00353.x
Reasons for variation in coverage in the NHS cervical screening programme
Abstract
In order to investigate reasons for variation in coverage of cervical screening, data from standard Department of Health returns were obtained for all Health Authorities for 1998/1999. Approximately 80% of the variation between health authorities is explained by differences in age distribution and area classification. Considerable differences between Health Authority and Office of National Statistics (ONS) population figures in City and Urban (London) areas for the age group 25-29 years and for City (London) for age group 30-34 years, suggest an effect of list inflation in these groups. Coverage as a performance indicator may be more accurately represented using the age range 35-64 years. Using this narrower age range, the percentage of health authorities meeting the 80% 5-year coverage target increases from 87% to 90%.
Similar articles
-
Educational level, voluntary private health insurance and opportunistic cancer screening among women in Catalonia (Spain).Eur J Cancer Prev. 1999 Oct;8(5):427-34. doi: 10.1097/00008469-199910000-00008. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1999. PMID: 10548398
-
Exploring the effects of population mobility on cervical screening coverage.Public Health. 2002 Nov;116(6):353-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.ph.1900880. Public Health. 2002. PMID: 12407475
-
[The coverage of cervical screening in Hungary].Orv Hetil. 2007 Nov 18;148(46):2177-82. doi: 10.1556/OH.2007.28956. Orv Hetil. 2007. PMID: 17988975 Hungarian.
-
Cervical cancer: the Indian perspective. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Nov;95 Suppl 1:S215-33. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(06)60037-4. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006. PMID: 17161161 Review.
-
Cervical cancer: disparities in screening, treatment, and survival.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003 Mar;12(3):242s-247s. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003. PMID: 12646519 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Risk of several cancers is higher in urban areas after adjusting for socioeconomic status. Results from a two-country population-based study of 18 common cancers.J Urban Health. 2014 Jun;91(3):510-25. doi: 10.1007/s11524-013-9846-3. J Urban Health. 2014. PMID: 24474611 Free PMC article.