Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study
- PMID: 11845860
- DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03402-6
Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative outcome obtained in patients undergoing elective aortic valve operation, either through ministernotomy or conventional sternotomy.
Methods: Between January 1999 and July 2001, 80 consecutive patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement were randomly divided into two groups: group I (n = 40 patients) undergoing a ministernotomy approach (reversed-C or reversed-L), and group II (n = 40 patients) undergoing conventional sternotomy.
Results: The length of skin incision was significantly shorter in group I than in group II (8.2+/-1.3 cm versus 23.7+/-2.6 cm, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in cardiopulmonary bypass duration, associated procedures, or aortic cross-clamping times. Total operating time was 3.7+/-0.46 hours in group I compared with 3.4+/-0.6 hours in group II (p = 0.014). A similar incidence of cardiac, neurologic, infective, and renal complications between groups was found. Mean mediastinal drainage and mean blood transfusions (amount of blood transfused) per patient were greater in group II (p < 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). Twenty-five (62.5%) patients in group II and 15 (37.5%) patients in group I required postoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.04). Mechanical ventilation time was significantly longer in group II (6.2+/-1.8 hours versus 4.4+/-0.9 hours, p = 0.006). Five days after the surgical procedure, spirometric data analysis demonstrated a significantly lower total lung capacity and maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures in group II compared with group I (p = 0.003, p = 0.007, and p < 0.001, respectively).
Conclusions: Our results showed that ministernotomy had not only important cosmetic advantages but also beneficial effects in blood loss and transfusion, postoperative pain, and probably in sternal stability. Ministernotomy also improved recovery of respiratory function and allowed earlier extubation and hospital discharge.
Comment in
-
Lesser impairment of respiratory function is the mechanism of faster recovery after partial sternotomy for valve replacement.Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Apr;75(4):1360; author reply 1360-1. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04272-8. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003. PMID: 12683604 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations.Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Aug;62(2):596-7. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996. PMID: 8694642 No abstract available.
-
Ministernotomy versus median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a prospective, randomized study.Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Jun;67(6):1583-7; discussion 1587-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00362-8. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999. PMID: 10391259 Clinical Trial.
-
"I" ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement.Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Jul;68(1):40-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00314-8. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999. PMID: 10421112 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical