Dose response for formaldehyde-induced cytotoxicity in the human respiratory tract
- PMID: 11846634
- DOI: 10.1006/rtph.2001.1515
Dose response for formaldehyde-induced cytotoxicity in the human respiratory tract
Abstract
Human studies of the sensory irritant effects of formaldehyde are complicated by the subjective nature of some clinical endpoints. This limits the usefulness of such studies for quantitative noncancer risk assessment of airborne formaldehyde. Objective measures of the noncancer effects of formaldehyde, such as the rate of regenerative cellular proliferation (RCP) secondary to cytolethality, can be obtained from laboratory animals but present the challenge of interspecies extrapolation of the data. To the extent that uncertainties associated with this extrapolation can be reduced, however, dose-response data obtained in laboratory animals are a viable alternative to clinical studies. Here, we describe the extrapolation of dose-response data for RCP from F344 rats to humans. Rats inhaled formaldehyde (0, 0.7, 2.0, 6.0, 10, and 15 ppm) 6 h/day, 5 days/week for up to 2 years. The dose response for RCP was J-shaped, with the rates of RCP at 0.7 and 2.0 ppm below but not statistically different from control, while the rates at the higher concentrations were significantly greater than control. Both the raw J-shaped data and a hockey-stick-shaped curve fitted to the raw data were used for predicting the human dose response for RCP. Cells lining the nasal airways of F344 rats and rhesus monkeys are comparably sensitive to the cytolethal effects of inhaled formaldehyde, suggesting that the equivalent human cells are also likely to be comparably sensitive. Using this assumption, the challenge of rat-to-human extrapolation was reduced to accurate prediction of site-specific flux of formaldehyde from inhaled air into the tissue lining the human respiratory tract. A computational fluid dynamics model of air flow and gas transport in the human nasal airways was linked to a typical path model of the human lung to provide site-specific flux predictions throughout the respiratory tract. Since breathing rate affects formaldehyde dosimetry, cytotoxicity dose-response curves were predicted for three standard working levels. With the most vigorous working level, the lowest concentrations of formaldehyde predicted to exert any cytotoxic effects in humans were 1.0 and 0.6 ppm, for the J-shaped and hockey-stick-shaped RCP curves, respectively. The predicted levels of response at the lowest effect concentrations are smaller than can be measured clinically. Published literature showing that the cytotoxicity of inhaled formaldehyde is related to exposure level rather than to duration of exposure suggests that the present analysis is a reasonable basis for derivation of standards for continuous human exposure.
© 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).
Similar articles
-
Human respiratory tract cancer risks of inhaled formaldehyde: dose-response predictions derived from biologically-motivated computational modeling of a combined rodent and human dataset.Toxicol Sci. 2004 Nov;82(1):279-96. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfh223. Epub 2004 Jul 14. Toxicol Sci. 2004. PMID: 15254341
-
Biologically motivated computational modeling of formaldehyde carcinogenicity in the F344 rat.Toxicol Sci. 2003 Oct;75(2):432-47. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfg182. Epub 2003 Jul 11. Toxicol Sci. 2003. PMID: 12857938
-
Inhaled formaldehyde: evaluation of sensory irritation in relation to carcinogenicity.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006 Mar;44(2):144-60. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.11.006. Epub 2006 Jan 18. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006. PMID: 16413643 Review.
-
Effects of endogenous formaldehyde in nasal tissues on inhaled formaldehyde dosimetry predictions in the rat, monkey, and human nasal passages.Toxicol Sci. 2014 Apr;138(2):412-24. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kft333. Epub 2014 Jan 2. Toxicol Sci. 2014. PMID: 24385418
-
The use of noncancer endpoints as a basis for establishing a reference concentration for formaldehyde.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002 Feb;35(1):23-31. doi: 10.1006/rtph.2002.1514. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002. PMID: 11846633 Review.
Cited by
-
Uncertainties in biologically-based modeling of formaldehyde-induced respiratory cancer risk: identification of key issues.Risk Anal. 2008 Aug;28(4):907-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01083.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28. Risk Anal. 2008. PMID: 18564991 Free PMC article.
-
Updating the biologically based dose-response model for the nasal carcinogenicity of inhaled formaldehyde in the F344 rat.Toxicol Sci. 2023 May 12;193(1):1-17. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfad028. Toxicol Sci. 2023. PMID: 36912747 Free PMC article.
-
S-phase sensing of DNA-protein crosslinks triggers TopBP1-independent ATR activation and p53-mediated cell death by formaldehyde.Cell Cycle. 2012 Jul 1;11(13):2526-37. doi: 10.4161/cc.20905. Epub 2012 Jul 1. Cell Cycle. 2012. PMID: 22722496 Free PMC article.
-
Relative contributions of endogenous and exogenous formaldehyde to formation of deoxyguanosine monoadducts and DNA-protein crosslink adducts of DNA in rat nasal mucosa.Toxicol Sci. 2023 Jan 31;191(1):15-24. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfac119. Toxicol Sci. 2023. PMID: 36409013 Free PMC article.
-
Formaldehyde Is a Potent Proteotoxic Stressor Causing Rapid Heat Shock Transcription Factor 1 Activation and Lys48-Linked Polyubiquitination of Proteins.Am J Pathol. 2016 Nov;186(11):2857-2868. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Sep 14. Am J Pathol. 2016. PMID: 27639166 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources