Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Jul-Aug;24(4):178-81.

Comparison of three forms of bowel preparations for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy

Affiliations
  • PMID: 11848001
Clinical Trial

Comparison of three forms of bowel preparations for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy

M Herman et al. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2001 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Our initial attempts at implementing a high-volume clinic were impeded by the quality of colon preparation. While two Fleet enema preparations were generally easy to administer and well tolerated, the results were frequently poor. Current studies are limited and opinions vary regarding the most effective bowel preparation. The purpose of this study was to compare three forms of bowel preparation for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. All patients scheduled for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy were given one of three colon preparations: two Fleet enemas; magnesium citrate orally the evening before, clear liquid diet and two Dulcolax suppositories the day of the exam; or magnesium citrate orally the evening before, clear liquid the day of the exam, and two Fleet enemas 1 hour before the procedure. Examinations were performed using a video flexible sigmoidoscopy by specialty trained gastroenterologists. Physicians were asked to rate the preparations as excellent, good, fair, or poor according to explicit criteria, and to document depth of insertion. Results showed that the magnesium citrate and Fleet enema preparation was excellent for 70% of patients, allowing for greater depth of insertion. Need for repeat examination due to poor preparation was infrequent with this group and patient tolerance of the preparation was acceptable.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources