High-resolution breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the entire carotid circulation
- PMID: 11856670
- DOI: 10.2214/ajr.178.3.1780543
High-resolution breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the entire carotid circulation
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of breathing on image quality of the aortic arch and carotid vessels during contrast-enhanced MR angiography and to show that high-resolution breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography combined with a timing-bolus technique can produce high-quality images of the entire carotid circulation.
Materials and methods: Forty patients underwent high-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography on a 1.5-T Magnetom Symphony. A coronal three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo sequence (TR/TE, 4.36/1.64; flip angle, 25 degrees) with asymmetric k-space acquisition was used. The 136 x 512 matrix yielded voxel sizes of 1.33 x 0.64 x 1.0 mm. A timing-bolus acquisition, orientated in the coronal plane to include the aortic arch, was obtained initially during free-breathing. Twenty milliliters of gadopenetate dimeglumine was injected at 2 mL/sec. Unenhanced and enhanced 3D volumes were recorded. A subtracted 3D set was calculated and subjected to a maximum-intensity-projection algorithm. Half of the patients held their breath during angiography and the other half did not. Aortic arch motion was measured on the timing-bolus acquisition as the distance moved by a single pixel in both the x and y directions. Maximum-intensity-projection MR images were assessed independently by two observers, and vessel sharpness was scored on a scale of 1-5. Sharpness was also assessed quantitatively by generating a signal intensity profile across the aortic arch vessel wall and calculating the average of the upslope and downslope at full-width half maximum. Visualization of carotid branch vessels was scored on a scale of 0-5, and venous contamination was scored on a scale of 0-3.
Results: Average in-plane aortic arch movement was 10.3 mm in the x direction and 8.7 mm in the y direction. Quantitative and qualitative sharpness of the aortic arch and great vessel origins was better (p < 0.05) during breath-holding than during non-breath-holding. No difference in the sharpness of the carotid vessels was noted between the two groups. Carotid branch vessels were well visualized from the aortic arch to the intracerebral circulation. The average venous contamination score was 0.56.
Conclusion: Breath-holding greatly improves the sharpness of the aortic arch and great vessel origins but has no effect on visualization of the carotid vessels. High-resolution breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography can produce high-quality, artifact-free images of the entire carotid circulation from the aortic arch to the intracerebral circulation.
Similar articles
-
Quantitative analysis of ECG-gated high-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):522-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.1467. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007. PMID: 17242264
-
Differences in injection rates on contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Feb;170(2):345-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.2.9456943. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998. PMID: 9456943 Clinical Trial.
-
Arterial-phase three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Jul;167(1):211-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.1.8659374. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996. PMID: 8659374
-
MR angiography of the thoracic aorta with an electrocardiographically triggered breath-hold contrast-enhanced sequence.Radiographics. 2000 Jan-Feb;20(1):107-20. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.20.1.g00ja24107. Radiographics. 2000. PMID: 10682776 Review.
-
Extracranial carotid MR imaging at 3T.Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006 Feb;14(1):109-21. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2005.12.003. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006. PMID: 16530639 Review.
Cited by
-
Low dose dual-source CT angiography of the thoracic aorta.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Oct;27(7):1025-34. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9742-9. Epub 2010 Nov 3. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011. PMID: 21046253
-
Analysis of the quantitative improvements in resting echocardiographic image sharpness through the use of contrast enhanced echocardiography.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jun;30(5):867-73. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0401-4. Epub 2014 Mar 20. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014. PMID: 24647916
-
ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.Circulation. 2010 Jun 8;121(22):2462-508. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181d44a8f. Epub 2010 May 17. Circulation. 2010. PMID: 20479157 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 8;55(23):2614-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.011. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20513610 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Ungated nonenhanced radial quiescent interval slice-selective (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography of the neck: Evaluation of image quality.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Dec;50(6):1798-1807. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26781. Epub 2019 May 11. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019. PMID: 31077477 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical